Monday, May 22, 2017

AV#161 - Schools with a Mission


What if all public schools (not just charters) were asked to define what they are about?

Next month my class of 1967 gathers to celebrate our 50th reunion.  Deerfield Academy, a boarding school in western Massachusetts, won’t be the same place we attended half a century ago (we certainly hope not!), and yet the loyalty we feel (and that the alumni office depends on) is based in part on the belief that the old school is, in some hard-to-define ways, much the same.  A new library, new dorms – but in its central purpose – still our school.

A crazy notion for public education?  A public school, almost by definition—some will argue—cannot have a mission that survives even a decade, let alone 50 years.  Always adjusting to the public’s demands–to current trends, changing demographics, new legislation out of Washington or the state capital, a new direction set by the school board, superintendent, the principal. Nothing lasts.

What if this is a key reason why many public schools struggle?  A guiding principle for our strongest private schools, adopted by the charter school world these past 25 years, is that schools need a clear set of beliefs and goals to commit to, and by which to set their course.  Hardly “innovative,” but sound.  What if every public school had a clear mission, one that—in its most essential ways—will endure?  

We just say yes

One of the most profound remarks I heard about public education in the past quarter century was this “joke”:
Q: What is the mission of our public schools?
A: You name it, we start it.
Or-
A: We just say yes.

A clear purpose

Why do we exist? What is our purpose?

No, this is not Philosophy 101. But educators and schools have our own existential questions.

And in 2017, in America, where we believe parents, especially in urban areas, should have a choice as to where to enroll their child, schools need to answer such questions.  Parents in the Denver metro area choose based on much more than a color (blue, green,yellow .…), its School Performance Framework rating (Performance, Improvement, Priority Improvement, Turnaround), or test scores. 
They want to know a school’s values, its most essential convictions.

Which requires that a school be clear about its mission.

Low-performing schools - “like a rolling stone”

In studying the state’s low-performing schools over many years, I see many slide downhill, bouncing from one “reform strategy” to the next, “with no direction home.”  They struggle to figure out their identity.  (if you doubt me, read a few of their Unified Improvement Plans.)  In my analysis of innovation status for turnaround schools, AV#159, I questioned if this “fresh start” gets at the root cause of their dysfunction.  They take on new names (Pueblo’s Risley Middle School becomes Risley International Academy of Innovation) or adopt some amorphous motif (Aurora’s Action Zone: “Five schools … united around a common theme of International Leadership”).  But do the fundamentals change?  You know the cliché: in the end, isn’t this just “rearranging a few chairs on the deck of the Titanic”?  Has the school community stopped to reflect on the basic values and beliefs behind its educational design? Has it articulated a broad vision that reflects its academic goals—and much more?  Has it hired a school leader and faculty fully committed to and well suited for its “new” plan?

Critical questions, if a school is to say to prospective families and students: We are about this.  Yes, we would like to serve anyone who shows up at our door, but please know we are not designed to be anything you want us to be. This is who we are.

The unfortunate either/or debate of neighborhood versus charter schools in Denver is less important than whether a school has a clear sense of purpose.  I believe public education as whole would do well if all schools, not just charters, were required to think long and hard about the school they choose to be.  Which cannot be–anymore than is true for any good organization—all things to all people.

Built to Last (Collins) and Start with Why (Sinek)

Built to Last:
Successful Habits of Visionary Companies
   “For (Jim) Collins and (Jerry) Porras, every organization has a purpose, even if it hasn’t been articulated yet. Purpose could be described as the heartbeat or soul of your organization—your organization’s ‘most fundamental reason for being’. Not to be confused with product lines, services or customers, purpose motivates and inspires. A true purpose grabs ‘the ‘soul’ of each organizational member” and reflects their ‘idealistic motivations for doing the work.’
   “For me, Collins and Porras’ best description of core purpose is: …like a guiding star on the horizon—forever pursued but never reached.”
Deerfield Academy was founded in 1797, in a charter signed by then Massachusetts governor Samuel Adams, pledging the Academy to “the instruction of youth, and the promotion of piety, religion and morality.”  Yes, its mission has changed since then; the non-denominational school I knew no longer put religion at the center.  I asked Deerfield for its mission or vision statements over its past 50 years—see excerpts in Addendum A.  I believe you will be struck by the school’s constancy of purpose—its why we exist—over this time. 

My white-haired or balding classmates from 1967 are thrilled to know Deerfield students today experience a less restrictive environment, a curriculum less narrow, a student body less homogeneous, a faculty less detached from the nation’s ills.  I know some classmates doubt it can ever change enough. But for many, we hope the best of the intangibles survive: a strong school community where a bright and dedicated faculty care about the students’ growth and well-being; an environment of high expectations in and beyond the classroom; a short-term goal of college preparation, and a long-term goal that we might each fulfill our potential and find a way to serve the common good.



The Shopping Mall High School – no coherence, no convictions

Schools cannot be static; they must respond to a changing world.  To a degree, perfectly reasonable.  And respond they do. In spite of the portentous and silly TV ads for the next generation of schools (XQ: The Super School Project), today’s schools do not look like those of 1917. 

But among the most telling critiques of the American high school—one of the three studies funded in part by Denver’s Gates Family Foundation in the 1980’s, and that helped inform the work of the Coalition of Essential Schools—is the book titled The Shopping Mall High School (Powell, Farrar, Cohen).  The authors found schools with no coherence and no convictions, eager to please “so that students will stay on, graduate, and be happy.”  Schools making “accommodations” that “produce a neutral environment where a do-your-own thing attitude prevails.”  High schools that “take few stands on what is educationally or morally important,” unable "to forge any workable consensus about what educational experiences are of most worth....”

Still true, yes?  Schools react, but they do not define what they are for. Or who they can best serve.

What charter schools borrow from the independent school world

   Emma Willard School, where I taught in the mid-1980’s, was founded in 1814. It is the oldest school in the nation still in existence set up to offer girls the same educational opportunity available to boys. Still true. 
   Note the first four words in its mission statement (Addendum B):
      “Honoring its founder's vision….” 
And once higher education was more available to young women, the school has maintained a college-prep focus.
My 35 or so years as a student and teacher were equally divided between public and private schools. One reason I cheered and worked for the fledgling charter school movement in the 1990’s was that I thought these new schools—like Deerfield, like the three private schools where I have taught—had one huge advantage: they would not be set up to be all things to all people. They would open with a distinct mission.  They would have the autonomy needed to hire the faculty and staff committed to the school’s most basic beliefs. They would attract families and students enthusiastic about the school’s educational philosophy, and commit resources in a way consistent with the school’s mission. 

They would be public schools, committed to follow state laws, but they would not be all over the map, responding willy-nilly to the latest trend or reluctantly complying with legislative mandates.  And—please note—this felt true for me while teaching in a charter school during the early years of No Child Left Behind.  Do you recall schools blaming Washington for all their woes back then?  Never our worry.  We had a mission.

Naturally, then, in reviewing charter school applications over many years for the Colorado League of Charter Schools, I paid close attention to this feature.  I would ask you to consider this advice in the League’s 41-page “Quality Standards for Developing Charter Schools”:


Vision & Mission Statements
   This section of the application reflects the school’s vision and mission statements as developed and agreed upon by the members of the founding committee and are likely to produce high-quality education outcomes.
   “I’ve found a key piece in all of this is how or whether a school weaves the mission and vision into the very fabric of their culture to ensure implementation in a tangible way.”
   Kathy Zlomke, New School Development Manager, Colorado League of Charter Schools
  
 These statements should answer the questions, “What is the purpose for the school and what is the applicant team’s vision for the school?” The rest of the application should answer, “How exactly will we get there?”  An explanation should be given as to the process and impetus for developing both the vision and mission statements. 
The vision of the school articulates how the applicants envision the school and its impact in the future (five to ten years).
·      The vision statement expresses the ideal, long-term impact, scope and scale of the school. It articulates what the school hopes to be, but not how the school will reach that vision. The vision should focus on essentials, be research based, and provide guidance to the board and administration as the school grows. (For example, all conversations about budget, planning, and staff development would be guided by the long-term vision.)
·      The vision statement is focused on the future. It concisely and succinctly defines what the school looks like in five to ten years when it is “all grown up.”

Interested in reading more on the value of, and advice on developing, a mission statement?
See Addendum C - Independent School Mission Statements and Missions
Addendum D - School Mission Statements: Where Is Your School Going?
Addendum E Keeping the Mission of the School



What if all public schools were called on to follow this practice? 

To be sure, not every mission statement hits the mark! 😊
   “As an art form, the mission statement had its dangers. As short-form poetry gave birth to the dirty limerick, mission statements became highly susceptible to both parody and banality. My favorite… comes from Maria Semple's brilliant dissection of independent school parent culture, Where'd You Go, Bernadette, in which the mission of the ‘Galer Street School’ is this: … 
a place where compassion, academics, and global connectitude join together to create civic-minded citizens of a sustainable and diverse planet.
   “As one character notes, this is a school that doesn't just think outside the box--its leaders ‘think outside the dictionary.’”
(Peter Gow, Education Week, 2014.  See more in Addendum C.)
What if this simple but powerful feature is a key reason for the success of many charters, that have borrowed this practice from a much older tradition–that of private schools?  Would it not help public schools escape the burden of trying to be all things to all people?  Would it not provide some much-needed stability to a field all-too subject to “the latest whatever,” to have a clear sense of what this school stands for—not just for a couple of years—but for the long haul?

1967, 2017, 2067 – What’s new?

We return to meet the old gang—most of them last seen 50 years ago. In return, the alumni office, of course, hopes for a few generous gifts.  What may seem strange is that, at this stage in our lives, we give to the school’s future–to what we hope students will experience 10, 20, … 50 years from now.  A school we will never see, but one that we want to believe will be true to the best of what we experienced 50 years ago.

Impossible, some will say. All is flux.  Nothing endures.
            
Really?  But what if the mission does?


Another View is a newsletter by Peter Huidekoper Jr.  Comments are welcome. 303-757-1225 - peterhdkpr@gmail.com





Addendum A

Deerfield Academy’s “evolving mission”: new words, even new ideas, and yet - much the same

I found it amusing to learn that there was no written school “mission” for Deerfield when I was there, that it was often “whatever the headmaster said it was” during his 66-year tenure (1902-1968).[1]  But Frank L. Boyden had a clear idea of the kind of school he wanted to build.  Faculty, students, and parents were confident Mr. and Mrs. Boyden would stay true to their beliefs about teenage age boys and how to help them learn and grow.  After Mr. Boyden retired, and in order to meet the expectations of the Association of Independent Schools in New England (AISNE) for accreditation, Deerfield began to articulate its “goals and objectives” (1971), its “goals and purposes” (1976 - approved again in 1982); its “purposes and objectives” (1991); and most recently, its mission (2002), revised (2008).  

No, not always the same wording, but easy to see the continuity throughout the past five decades:

1971 - “The function of education is to help the student to discover and want to develop the qualities of his human potential – intellectual, spiritual, aesthetic, physical, social – which can lead to his greatest fulfillment as a human being and as a contributor to the welfare of society.”

1976 – “The ideal purpose of the Deerfield experience is to help and to encourage students in those qualities – intellectual, physical, aesthetic, spiritual, social, and moral – which can bring them optimum fulfillment as human beings and can encourage them to become significant contributors to the quality of their community.”   (See below, from 1981 – Change, continuity – and the Constitution!)

1991 – “The purpose of Deerfield Academy is to educate students – intellectually, aesthetically, socially, physically, and morally – so that they may become fulfilled human beings and responsible, contributing citizens.”

2002 – “Deerfield is a vibrant learning community nurturing high standards of scholarship, citizenship and personal responsibility. Through a demanding liberal arts curriculum, extensive co-curricular program and supportive residential environment, Deerfield encourages each student to develop an inquisitive and creative mind, sound body, strong moral character and a commitment to service.   The setting of the campus is rich in tradition and beauty, inspires reflection, study and play, the cultivation of enduring friendships, and the growth of a defining community spirit.”

2008 - “Deerfield Academy is an independent secondary school committed to high standards of scholarship, citizenship, and personal responsibility.
   “Through a rigorous liberal arts curriculum, extensive co-curricular program, and supportive residential environment, Deerfield encourages each student to develop an inquisitive and creative mind, sound body, and strong moral character.
   “Set in a historic village bounded by river, hills, and farms, Deerfield inspires reflection, study and play, abiding friendships, and a defining school spirit.”
   “A vibrant, ethical community that embraces diversity, the Academy prepares students for leadership in a rapidly changing world that requires global understandingenvironmental stewardship, and dedication to service.”  https://deerfield.edu/mission/

Change, continuity, and … the Constitution! (1981)
From the 1981 review of Purposes and Objectives. “The purposes and objectives of the school are the subject of continuous review…. It should be noted that some do not concur with the premise on page 14 of the Evaluation Handbook: ‘No set of purposes and objectives can remain unchanged for long if the school is to continue alive to the world in which it exists.’ It seems to many people at the Academy that if the goals and purposes are well written and sensible that they can indeed stand the test of time and that simple subject of change does not make them better.  In that sense, they are much like the United States Constitution which does not need to be rewritten but simply reinterpreted in order to play a positive role in contemporary society.”


Addendum B

Emma Willard School – founded 1814

Mission Statement. Honoring its founder's vision, Emma Willard School proudly fosters in each young woman a love of learning, the habits of an intellectual life, and the character, moral strength, and qualities of leadership to serve and shape her world.

After the mission statement, the school then captures 5 CORE VALUES in a sentence or two.

Two examples, of the five:

The Journey - Through daily moments of discovery, struggle, failure, success, and connection we develop a belief in ourselves, resiliency of character, and an awareness of the transformative power of impassioned engagement with our world.

Wellbeing – Dynamic balance in mind, body, and spirit is a life-long pursuit that provides a healthy foundation for self-esteem and happiness. We will care for one another—in good times and in bad times.  https://www.emmawillard.org/about-emma/mission



[1] “Through the end of the headmastership of Mr. Boyden, it is fair to say the school was run in a very non-conventional administrative fashion …. Certainly, the purposes and objectives of the school were not written down, were not reviewed by the trustees, by the students, or by the faculty and certainly were not openly questioned by any constituency.  The purposes and objectives of the school were articulated in the day-to-day decisions of the people on the faculty who, for the most part over the years, did what Mr. Boyden wanted.” (From the 1981 statement of “Purposes and Objectives,” p. 2.) 


Addendum C

Independent School Mission Statements and Missions - By Peter Gow*, July 18, 2014
In a few past posts here I've touched on the role of mission statements in guiding each independent school along its paths toward doing whatever it purports to do. Remembering that an independent school is by definition a self-governing institution operating outside the formal "control" of a higher body (say, a diocese or a religious province or even another non-profit entity), the need for some kind of pole star or driving impetus is critical if the school is to have any coherence in its purposes, its programs, and its culture.
Although the formal acknowledgment of mission in a concise statement is a product of the last half century, accrediting bodies were quick to focus on the mission statement as the central element of the school accrediting process. For many years this process was largely a close study, first by the school and then by a visiting team, of how and how fully a school was enacting or implementing or carrying out its mission, supplemented by some questions around basic operational issues like financial sustainability, compliance, and safety.
This process led to a kind of enshrinement of the mission statement creation process, in which schools struggled to capture in a paragraph or so the essence of their being and purpose. Schools could agonize over the process, with committees, consultants, and resident wordsmiths racking up hours (billable, from the consultants' perspective) as they struggled to get a mission statement that was "just so." Cheerleading from the business world, whose boom mission years were those following the publication of mission-lover Jim Collins's Good to Great (and its step-child, Good to Great and the Social Sectors), turned mission-writing into an art form, somewhere between haiku and sonnet….
In a part of my life I get to talk to schools and school people about things to do with telling their own story, and my work usually begins by looking at a school's mission statement. Some are quite compelling: specific, realistic, and concise without being reductive. Others, however, stray into territory marked out in this generic statement aggregated by Lauren Hasten for a 2009 article for Independent School magazine
Our school provides a supportive community while encouraging individuality, nurtures the spirit while challenging the intellect, and inspires a lifelong love of learning while teaching respect, responsibility, compassion, and an appreciation of diversity.

Like many real statements, this one leaves no cliché unturned and is almost unassailably true for so many schools--independent, public, religious, charter, and possibly even "home"—as to be virtually useless as a way to understand what a school using it might actually be like.
The essence of a mission statement is of course to communicate a school's mission, but in reality looking at mission in the broadest sense is a much more useful way for schools and outsiders to evaluate the degree to which a school is doing what is claims to be doing. "Mission" finds expression in such areas as
* values and vision statements
* strategic thinking, priorities, and directions
* rules and policies for students, employees, and families
* the structure of the academic and extracurricular programs
* expressions of "moral culture," including programs in "character" and "life-skills" education
* systems of rewards and recognition
They understand that a school's mission is more than just a bunch of lovely words.
*Peter Gow has been an administrator and teacher in independent schools for nearly 40 years. Currently Executive Director of the Independent Curriculum Group, he writes about the relationship between private and public education and how the two sectors might draw upon each other's strengths.


Addendum D


What is your school's mission? If you have to search through your handbook or you can't recall the entire lengthy statement, you probably aren't making the most of your school's mantra. How can you make your mission statement more meaningful? … Tips for keeping the mission statement alive once it's written.

"I think it is important for a faculty to have a common set of beliefs," teacher Jean Etheridge tells Education World. "Sometimes teachers get so wrapped up in the little stuff that we need to be reminded of where we are going."

Mountain Gap Middle School Mission Statement

The mission of Mountain Gap Middle School is to provide each student a diverse education in a safe, supportive environment that promotes self-discipline, motivation, and excellence in learning. The Mountain Gap team joins the parents and community to assist the students in developing skills to become independent and self-sufficient adults who will succeed and contribute responsibly in a global community.
At schools like Mountain Gap Middle School in Huntsville, Alabama, where Etheridge teaches seventh grade, philosophies and mission statements are expected. They are one of the regional accreditation requirements. Mountain Gap's mission statement (see sidebar) was revised. The school faculty voted to accept the changes, ensuring that the educators are aware of the statement and agree with the beliefs it enumerates.

"I do believe what our mission statement says," says Etheridge. "Perhaps it is just a reminder of what I am about when I feel daily frustrations and disappointments have caused me to stray from my course. Maybe having a hand in writing the mission statement increases my sense of ownership."

MISSION IS A REFERENCE POINT, A REMINDER

Mountain Gap Middle School isn't alone in placing importance on the development and implementation of a mission statement. Administrators and faculty across the country are making an effort to design a creed that identifies the goals, policies, and aspirations their school communities seek to achieve.

The mission statement of Freeport (Maine) Middle School (see sidebar) was established by a subcommittee of the faculty many years before Chris Toy became the school's principal. The faculty felt that a clear mission statement would facilitate making decisions that supported middle level students. The statement is reviewed and revised periodically.

"We do refer to the mission and belief statements when we are discussing or debating programs and decisions," says Toy. "Our school organization tends to reflect our mission and belief statements. I have it posted in my office to remind me of the context for the many issues and decisions I work through each day."

Toy adds, "I think the mission is a useful template from which to work. It's probably an ideal, but not a reality, for many of us."

MISSION STATEMENT IN PRACTICE

"There was I time when I would inwardly groan when faced with the prospect of constructing yet another mission statement. I saw such a task as too much time spent on something that would soon be tucked away and forgotten," explains Jean Byl, a media specialist at Waverly-Shell Rock (Iowa) Junior High School. "However, because we actually use the statement and remind students and discuss with students our mission statement, I now see it as a useful means of communication with the kids."

Freeport Middle School Mission Statement

The Freeport Middle School exists to serve the unique academic, physical, social, and emotional needs of students who are in a special and critical period of their lives as they change from childhood to adolescence. The staff of Freeport Middle School is committed to creating and maintaining an orderly, trusting, and caring environment where teaching and learning are exciting and students are assisted as they develop responsibility. All aspects of the school's organization, curricular, and cocurricular activities are child centered and designed to accommodate individual learning styles so that all may experience success.
Dick Jensen, principal at Waverly-Shell Rock, has reported that 80 percent of the discipline problems he deals with somehow relate to a lack of respect or responsibility. The mission statement of the school targets that concern. It states, "We will respect ourselves and one another, appreciate individual differences, and encourage one another to reach our potential."

"We realized that we needed a framework to express to students (and parents) who and what we would like our students and school to be -- that is, an environment that fosters respectful and responsible students," states Byl.

Each morning, the eighth grade-speech students give the morning announcements and also read the mission statement at the junior high. The mission is also printed on the school stationery and the students' agenda (planner) books.

Though it is difficult for Byl to assess the impact the mission statement has had on the school community, she has found "teachable moments" in which the mission statement has provided a springboard for discussion. Faculty members at the school emphasize the mission statement at the beginning of the year as a means of clarifying expectations. The statement is also used in disciplinary conferences. The school is now considering having students write personal mission statements.

"I like our mission statement because I think it's so pertinent for the junior high student," Byl says. "It addresses what we hope they will strive to be as people. We all know the trials and tribulations of adolescence. [Students] are seeking to define themselves and to find their niche. The mission statement gives focus to some characteristics that are keys to happy young people who are in healthy relationships with other people."

PUTTING VISION INTO THE MISSION

Hayes Mizell, the director of the Program for Student Achievement of the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, agrees with the idea of incorporating the mission statement in the daily activities of a school.
Many mission statements have little practical meaning, Mizell tells Education World. They are posted on walls and in the student handbook or scheduler, but they rarely guide or challenge the school. They are too safe and too easily forgotten. Even in the best of circumstances, Mizell suggests, mission statements are often one more good intention pushed to the background.

"I think a major problem with most mission statements is that they are static," Mizell tells Education World. "They seem to say, at best, 'This is who we are. This is what we do. This is what we value.' But if one believes, as I do, that most schools need to improve, such a statement merely affirms what the school is rather than what it should be."

Mizell encourages schools to develop a vision statement rather than a mission statement.
"Of course, if either a mission or a vision statement is just so many words, then it is largely useless," says Mizell. "That does not have to be the case. As in other areas of education, a school will get out of its vision statement, or even a mission statement, exactly what it puts into it. However, in my view the statement should also be a tool the school can use to push itself forward."

MAKE THE MOST OF YOUR MISSION OR VISION STATEMENT

A school's mission, or vision, statement is a living document, says Hayes Mizell. Below, Mizell shares his thoughts about how school leaders can keep the vision alive.

Establish Your Own Vision Statement

"See the Lakeview High School Mission Statement for an example. A school should develop its own vision statement. What is the school striving to become? What does it want to achieve? To what extent will it hold itself accountable for progressing toward fulfilling its vision?"

Revisit the Vision Statement During the School Year

"Several times during the school year, the principal may use the vision statement as the opening for faculty meetings. Make sure each faculty member has a copy in his or her hand, then read the statement, and then allow 15 or 20 minutes for open discussion about how the school is or is not progressing toward fulfilling its vision. With this kind of prompt, there could be some very interesting and lively discussions, and the vision statement will be a living document. The vision statement could also be used this way for each meeting of the school site council or school leadership team."

Reflect on the Statement at Year End

"Probably once a year, perhaps at the end of school, a school could use its vision statement for an hour-long reflective discussion about progress or setbacks that occurred during the school year in relation to the vision statement. What progress did we make? Where did we drop the ball? What is the evidence that we are moving closer to fulfilling our vision or not? What do we need to do next year to accelerate our progress toward fulfilling our vision?"


Addendum E

Keeping the Mission of the School

In creating and reviewing the mission, the board must understand and concentrate on the unique focus and expertise of the school. It must realize what the school is not as well as what it is. Too many mission statements are generic — they could apply to many schools. Boards that truly understand the role of their schools in the communities they serve draft mission statements that, by themselves and without amplification, clearly articulate the vital, inviolate characteristics of these schools. Good mission statements do not explain “how” or “why.” They communicate “what” in clear, inspiring, and guiding words. Mission statements last over time, but regular reviews of the mission are important so that trustees understand and support it. In reviewing a mission statement, it is just as valuable an exercise to intentionally affirm the current wording as to change it.  (Excerpted from the Trustee Handbook, 9th Edition, for the National Association of Independent Schools, 2007)
http://www.nais.org/Articles/Pages/Keeping-the-Mission-of-the-School.aspx -- (8/13/2013), 





Friday, April 21, 2017

AV#160 - The Governors' State of the State - on Education - 2017

Glad/Jealous - Second annual report from Washington, D.C.

Priorities for our next governor?

“The Democratic field of Colorado gubernatorial hopefuls is firming up — and education promises to play an outsized role in the race.”  (Chalkbeat Colorado, April 11, 2017)[i]

1.   Our lowest-performing schools
2.   The teaching profession
3.   Students’ reading skills
This week the Colorado Education Policy Fellowship Program (EPFP) is here in Washington, D.C., attending the annual national conference of the 15 states with EPFP chapters.  Over 300 Fellows, including our 8 Colorado Fellows (see Addendum A) in this year’s program, take part in the Washington Policy Seminar, April 23-26. (http://epfp.iel.org/page/2017_WPS)    

It is a privilege to be part of a national conference where we can listen to and learn from other states—our “laboratories of democracy,”[1] as Louis Brandeis called them (see Addendum B)—facing similar challenges for their K-12 education system.  

So again, to offer my fellow Coloradans a similar opportunity, I use these pages to create my own “cross-country tour.”  As I did last year, I look to the recent state of the state addresses from the nation’s governors in order to see what they hope to tackle to improve their schools. 

This year, less: Why I’m glad we’re not ….  I’ll just say I am grateful we’re not …  Oregon!  Gov. Kate Brown’s address included this critique: "Our schools continue to be among the nation's leaders in all the wrong categories—the largest class size, the shortest school year, and the highest drop-out rate.”

 As a man inclined, unfortunately, to jealousy, what follows is more: Darn, I wish we could hear our state leader say that!  Especially on three fundamental topics: our lowest-performing schools; the state of the teaching profession; and students’ reading skills.  
   
**

Caveat #1: Regular readers of Another View should not be surprised by this Independent voter’s distress over our Governor’s perfunctory remarks on K-12 education in his state of the state.  (See Addendum C for Education Week’s summary of Gov. John Hickenlooper’s speech – all about broadband and internet access.  I add an excerpt—his passage about Colorado as “a national model for matching education with skills based training.” (If you too find that less than inspiring, see my satirical AV#155 – on schools as “training centers for the workplace.” Are we redefining the very purpose of public education?)

I have come to accept that Gov. Hickenlooper has other priorities than improving our schools.  At least we have a decent man representing our state, a person who can articulate our fear and grief after the Waldo Canyon Wildfire, or after the killing spree in an Aurora theater.  Decency… highly prized in 2017….

But for those of you who wish to succeed Hickenlooper in 2019, take note of the attention to specific K-12 issues we hear from other governors.  I am not always jealous of the specific positions they take.  I hope to avoid revealing my bias on the positions advocated here.  My emphasis is on the degree to which, as the highest elected officer in their state, their speeches focused on K-12 issues. True, mere words.  But an indication—is it not?—of interest, perhaps even commitment.  And leadership.

Caveat #2: Another View is merely one individual’s perspective; it is not intended to reflect the views of Colorado EPFP, which I coordinate. EPFP is a non-partisan organization; in its own words, it “does not engage in advocacy (and) does not take positions on education and/or policy issues on any level.”

Governors’ State of the State Addresses – Education – 2017

[All taken from Education Week’s summaries of state-of-the-state addresses given by governors this winter.  Found in Education Week’s issues of Jan. 11, 18, 25, and Feb 8, 15, March 1.]

1.       I am jealous when other governors … focus on their lowest-performing schools.

   The Colorado Department of Education lists 104 schools/programs (roughly 5% of our 1,900 schools) eligible in 2017 for federal TIG funds “to support schools identified as chronically low performing schools as indicated by state assessments.”[ii]   
If the state believes it has on obligation to provide an equitable education to all its students, it is necessary (both No Child Left Behind and the new federal law, Every Student Succeeds Act, concur) to make an extra commitment to address its 
lowest-performing schools, those in the
bottom 5% on state ratings.
                                                                                                             
Hence my jealousy when the governor speaks of the state’s responsibility to confront the sad truth that far too many low-performing schools fail to make significant improvement, in spite of large grants and innumerable efforts. In our “laboratories,” we have pursued a wide range of strategies to turn these schools around.  Given the poor results—so far—in most states, how sad that we do not do more to learn from each other on what is and is not working.  At least these governors assert: we must tackle this problem.  The state will act

Georgia - Gov. Nathan Deal (R) – “… said he would work with leaders of Georgia's GOP-controlled statehouse to craft legislation to address ‘chronically failing schools,’ particularly at the elementary school level. The vast majority of Georgia's lowest-performing schools serve those grades, he said. The importance of helping those schools should be clear, including to ‘those in the education community who so staunchly support the status quo,’ the governor said.”

Idaho - Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter (R) – “Other funding would go toward leadership training of principals in low-performing schools….”

Massachusetts – Gov. Charlie Baker (R) - “encouraged the state’s board of education to use its power to take over ‘struggling districts.’  Existing takeovers of three districts have demonstrated that state takeovers can offer significant benefits to students, parents, and teachers in schools that need our support.’” 

Illinois – Gov. Bruce Rauner (R) - “Education was a significant piece of the governor's annual address to legislators, in which he outlined 10 long-term goals including expanding school choice for children attending academically struggling schools….”

Maryland – Gov. Larry Hogan (R) - “He also advocated passage of a bill that would facilitate charter school approvals in Maryland, and pushed to add $2 million to a $5 million voucher program that lets low-income students attend private schools. That investment would help children who are ‘trapped in persistently failing schools,’ Hogan said.”

(Voucher opponents will protest, but I would ask: how well is your state addressing its chronic low-performing schools?  Where we see little attention to this issue, and almost no progress, one of the policy options to help poorly served students might well be vouchers.  Who is to blame when that happens?)


2.       I am jealous to hear so many governors focus on … teachers and the teaching profession.

“America has a teacher shortage, and a new study says it’s getting worse” Washington Post, 9/14/16
“State’s teacher shortage affecting Aurora-area school districts, too” Aurora Sentinel, 12/9/16
Arizona – Gov. Doug Ducey (D) - “Signaling that schools will be a top priority during the upcoming legislative session, Ducey outlined plans for an education-heavy agenda, including statewide teacher pay raises, … and a $1,000 signing bonus for new teachers who take jobs in low-income districts…. To ease a teacher shortage, Ducey wants state universities to provide free tuition for prospective educators as part of a program that would also guarantee jobs for graduates....”

Georgia - Deal (R) – “The governor told lawmakers in his in his annual speech that he will propose granting teachers a 2 percent pay increase, in addition to merit-pay raise.”

Idaho - Otter (R) - “The governor called for an increase in spending on public education of more than 6 percent … as he made education the cornerstone of his address…. The largest share would be an ongoing $58 million to continue implementing the career ladder pay model for public school teachers. That would be added to the $75 million invested over the past two years in this area, he said.”

Kansas - Gov. Sam Brownback (R) – “Brownback also proposed reforming the state's teacher certification requirements to ‘create a pathway bringing more teachers to Kansas,’ as well as creating a scholarship program for Kansas students who want to become teachers ….” 

Missouri - Gov. Eric Greitens (R) – “Missouri also ranks 47th in starting teacher pay, he said, and ‘our great teachers deserve to be paid more.’”

South Carolina - Gov. Nikki Haley (R) – “The governor pointed to updating the state's school funding formula …, as well as an initiative to boost education technology in rural districts and give bonuses to teachers who committed to go to high-needs schools.”

West Virginia - Gov. Jim Justice (D) – “Justice proposed a 2 percent raise for teachers and said he was ‘ashamed’ that it couldn't be more.” 

3.  As I wrote last year, I am jealous when other governors focus on ... our youngest students, especially their reading skills.    

UNITED STATES – READING SKILLS 2015, “36% of 4th grade students and 34% of 8th grade students perform at or above the Proficient level in NAEP reading.” [iii]
         New Mexico – Gov. Susana Martinez (R)  – “… the governor used her 45-minute address to resume her push to hold back struggling 3rd graders who are not reading at grade level.”




COLORADO – READING SKILLS
  In 2016, after the 3nd year of full implementation of the READ Act, 39,014 (nearly 15%) of our K-3 students were identified as significantly deficient readers.[iv]
  In 2016, only 37.4% of the 63,385 3rd graders met or exceeded expectations on the PARCC assessment in English.
  For 9th graders, much the same: 37.2%[v].
                                        NAEP 
  In 2015, on the National Assessment of Progress, only 39% of Colorado 4th graders performed at or above proficient in reading.[vi]
  The Readiness Report from Colorado Succeeds notes that since 2007, “4th grade proficiency rates have been stagnant….”[vii]
So. Carolina – Haley (R) – “She also noted that the state now requires students to read on grade level to be promoted beyond 3rd grade.”                                     
But that’s it - for any comments on reading - from the highlights of speeches by 34 of the nation’s governors.  Why focus on something as old hat as reading (Isn’t “Why Johnny Can’t Read?” a headline from the Eisenhower Administration?), when we can be so much more in vogue and placate the business community and emphasize the critical need for … are you ready? … computer science.

Yes, reading is now a distant second to computer science.  Although only briefly reflected in Education Week’s summaries (Gov. Gina Raimondo “garnered applause from the legislature” by announcing that “Rhode Island will be the first state to offer computer science classes in every public school.”), computer science appears to be all the rage in governors’ offices. (See Addendum D, a summary from the Education Commission of the States - Computer Science, STEM Gain Traction in 2017 State of the State Addresses.)  Hop on the bandw ...idth!

I would simply ask: but what if today’s Johnny, Jaime, and Jakaya can’t read?

Are you running for Governor? See Addendum E, from KIDS COUNT IN COLORADO 2016 - Colorado Child Well-Being Index: Fourth-Graders Not Proficient in Reading.  If I had one page to hand every gubernatorial candidate for 2019, here it is.


Leadership - Keep our eye on the ball

Of course computers matter.  All I learn about the many unmet needs to provide equity for our rural schools makes me sympathetic to all the plans from governors—including from our governor (again, Addendum C)—to expand broadband to rural schools (examples from state of the states, Addendum F).  And yet I am skeptical when state leaders can say nothing about reading or writing skills but exhibit remarkable enthusiasm for career tech-programs, training for jobs—and all things technological. As Addendum G shows, we saw plenty of that in the governors’ speeches this winter.

Good schools try to do so much, but they are clear that they cannot do it all.  It is why having a clear mission and staying true to their central purpose and chief values matters (see my next newsletter). 

Policymakers do not help when they, too, react to the latest buzz and take our attention away from the most critical issues.

Governors can help their states focus, even (especially?) when they were last year’s key policy issues. 

What is the best strategy to turn around low-performing schools? 

How can we recruit, support, and keep good teachers?

How to ensure more kids read at grade level? 

Three priorities … for Colorado’s next governor?



Addendum A

Colorado Education Policy Fellowship Program  –  2016-17
Name
Job
Organization
Alyssa Rafa
Policy Researcher
Education Commission of the States
Heather Furman
Investment Management Analyst
Charter School Growth Fund
Andrea Helaine

Instructional Designer, Project Manager
CSU-University’s Global Campus and Walden University
Joellen Kralik
Policy Associate,
Education Program 
National Conference of State Legislatures 
MaryGrace Longoria
Education Organizer, Family & Community Engagement
Stand for Children
Riley McIntyre
Program Director
Colorado I Have a Dream Foundation,
Ruby Hill Site
Carol Schneider
Community Partnership Program Manager
Department of Extended Learning and Community Schools, Denver Public Schools 
Marita Whalen
Math Teacher
West Leadership Academy,
Denver Public Schools


Addendum B


“The individual states in the United States are sometimes called ‘laboratories of democracy’ because they can experiment with innovative policy ideas. This allows other states and the nation as a whole to see if the new ideas work or not before they adopt them.”

Addendum C

From Gov. Hickenlooper’s State of the State

Education Week’s summary of the points made on K-12 schools in his address on Jan. 12, 2017:

   The governor introduced a goal of giving 100 percent of Colorado access to high-speed internet by 2020. Every school, hospital, clinic, and home should have high-speed internet, Hickenlooper said. Currently, 70 percent of households have access, and he hopes the creation of a broadband office will lift that figure to 85 percent before he leaves office.
   "Tonight, somewhere in one of these communities, a high school student will sit in a parked car outside her town library. She'll huddle over her laptop, face glowing from the screen as she tries to finish her paper, because it's the only place she can get Wi-Fi," he said. "This isn't right." http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/01/25/state-of-the-states.html?qs=state+of+states+inmeta:Cover_year%3D2017

Additional excerpts from Hickenlooper’s State of the State Address:

                And quality of life starts with a good job.
    From high school students wanting to work as apprentices--to the many Coloradans who want a new career--either from passion or necessity--these jobs should be available for everyone.
    If we do this right, there should be an opportunity for thousands of Coloradans to acquire skills either in classrooms or on the job that are career-focused and transferrable to different industries in the future. …
    Today, we are a national model for matching education with skills based training.
Sean Wybrant is Colorado’s Teacher of the Year. He has been teaching for 11 years at Palmer High in Colorado Springs, as he said, to “change the world.” And he’s changing it by focusing on the one-third of our kids who won’t go on to four year or two year colleges. He’s preparing the next generation for the career and technical jobs of tomorrow.
    Tim Kistler is the Superintendent of the Peyton School District in El Paso County, where he helped open the Woods Manufacturing Program in an empty middle school. It teaches students cutting edge skills needed in the woodworking industry.
    We thank both Sean and Tim for helping to close the skills gap, and for making sure all students realize their potential.
    Closing the gap means giving students a solid foundation for success at every step of their education, as they move from preschool through K-12, toward college, certificate, or apprenticeship and onto a good job.

Addendum D

From the Education Commission of the States –
Computer Science, STEM Gain Traction in 2017 State of the State Addresses

So far in 2017, STEM and computer science continue to capture governors’ attention as they look for ways to better align education with projected workforce demands. Here’s a quick look at governors’ computer science and STEM proposals in 2017 State of the State addresses: 
·         Arizona: Gov. Ducey proposed a statewide computer science and coding initiative, coupled with an effort to connect rural schools to high-speed internet. His State of the State also proposes loan forgiveness for STEM teachers.
·         Idaho: Gov. Otter urges continued support for the STEM Action Center and its groundbreaking Computer Science Initiative. He also notes that some of his higher education budget priorities focus on workforce development and expanding programs at public four-year institutions and community colleges that support such in-demand career fields as computer science.
·         Indiana: Recently inaugurated Gov. Holcomb announced his intent to invest $1 million each year to lead a statewide effort to better coordinate K-12 STEM education throughout Indiana.
·         Iowa: Gov. Branstad declared that he and Lt. Gov. Reynolds are launching a comprehensive computer science initiative. They’re encouraging every high school to offer at least one high-quality computer science course, every middle school to provide exploratory computer science, and every elementary school to include an introduction to computer science. Program initiatives prioritized for the 2017 session also include:
-Establish high-quality computer science standards.
-Create a computer science professional development incentive fund to train teachers.
-Convene an advisory group to recommend how to count computer science as a math credit toward high school graduation.
·         Michigan: Gov. Snyder expressed his desire for the state’s schools to improve in computer science, computer education and cyber security.
·         And New York’s Gov. Cuomo has unveiled a number of proposals at a series of regional State of the State addresses. A set of proposals specific to the 21st century workforce includes:
-An additional $5.3 million to expand early college high school programs, such as the nationally recognized Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH) program to include pathways to education and employment in the tech sector, with an emphasis on computer science education.
-$2 million to create a new cohort of 115 K-12 teachers in the NYS Master Teacher Program, specifically in computer science. Current master teachers will help mentor the new cohort to ensure the most innovative teacher practices in the STEM fields are shared across all grades and regions.
-Launching a public-private partnership to help train educators across the state to teach computer science. The state will offer professional development opportunities for teachers, and modernize the curriculum to advance computer science education across the state. 




Addendum E

FROM THE COLORADO CHILDREN’ CAMPAIGN KIDS COUNT IN COLORADO 2016     from pages 84 and 85


Fourth-grade reading proficiency is a crucial marker in a child’s educational development and a strong predictor of future academic success. By fourth grade, children must use reading skills to learn other subjects, making mastery of reading critical to their ability to keep up academically. Children who are not reading at grade level by the end of third grade are four times more likely to drop out of high school than children who are reading proficiently.

Data Highlights
·         In Colorado, 58 percent of all fourth-graders were reading below grade level in 2015, according to the CMAS English language arts assessment.
·         The percent of fourth-graders not reading at grade level varies across the state. Among Colorado’s largest counties, Montezuma County had the highest percentage of fourth-graders not reading at grade level (76 percent). Routt County had the lowest, with 43 percent of fourth graders not reading at grade level.

National Achievement Gaps in Fourth Grade Reading

While states use their own assessments to measure proficiency in core subjects, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is currently the only standardized assessment that allows for comparisons of student proficiency across states. Often called “the nation’s report card,” the NAEP assesses randomly selected students in grades 4, 8 and 12 from across the nation to help provide a picture of nationwide student achievement over time. Like the CMAS, the NAEP also illustrates the achievement gap between low-income students and higher-income students, as well as between white students and students of color.

Data Highlights
·         In 2015, Colorado had the 12th-largest fourth grade reading achievement gap in the nation; only 21 percent of low-income students scored proficient or above in reading on the NAEP, compared to 54 percent of higher-income students.
·         The income-based achievement gap in Colorado is widening over time. Between 2003 and 2015, the gap in reading proficiency levels between low-income and higher-income students grew by 27 percent.
·         While fourth-graders in Colorado scored slightly higher than the U.S. average, not all students fared equally. Only 20 percent of Colorado’s Hispanic students and 27 percent of black students were reading at grade level in 2015, compared to 51 percent of white students.

Addendum F

Broadband and rural schools

Arizona - Ducey (D) - “on his to-do list… connecting rural and tribal school to high-speed broadband.”

Montana -Bullock (D) – “asked the legislature … to invest $2 million toward internet connectivity in schools.

Nevada – Sandavol (R) – “Sandoval also proposed $2 million to establish a … Nevada Connect Kids Initiative, to expand high-speed-broadband internet access in schools, particularly in rural areas.

So. Carolina- Haley (R) - “pointed to … an initiative to boost education technology in rural districts.”

Wisconsin - Walker (R) - “… pledged to boost support for improved internet connectivity for schools …  The governor called for $36 million in new spending …to upgrade broadband technology, which will also support tech training for teachers from small and rural districts.” (1/10)

Addendum G

Technology, Training, and Virtual Classes

Idaho – Otter ( R) – “Classroom technology also would receive a boost of $10 million a year, starting in fiscal 2018.”

Indiana- Holcomb (x) – “He called … streamlining state funds for science, technology, engineering, and math programs; and creating a skilled workforce to replace retiring baby boomers and to prepare for new jobs that will be created.”

Missouri -Gov. Eric Greitens (R) - “We need to expand course-access programs, so that every child in Missouri can use technology to get the education they need," he said.

North Dakota - Burgum (R) – “Education is one of the areas that ‘demands change,’ Burgum said in his first State of the State speech after being elected last year. ‘We can't prepare our kids for the 21st century using a 19th-century model.’  “To illustrate the old vs. new contrast, the governor cited a couple of examples in his speech. Burgum, who sold a software company to Microsoft and was an executive there, noted that he did an internet search for ‘online courses for free’ and received 51.6 million responses.

Oregon- Brown (D) - “She also highlighted investments in technical and career training and said she would continue to support that work. (Jan 9)

Virginia - McAuliffe (x) - “He said he aims to provide full-time virtual instruction to every Virginia student in 2017.”


ENDNOTES


[1] COMMENT: Don’t we all wish the idea of “laboratories of democracy” were not the exception to the rule?  What prevents us from studying and learning from good efforts in other states?  Or from avoiding miss-steps by seeing what is not working elsewhere?  Another reason for conferences like the Washington Policy Seminar - and this issue of Another View.



[iv] Figure came from CDE in an email to me, April 4, 2017.  Full report on 2016 results will be made public.  CDE explained that the numbers have climbed from 2015 in part because “the reporting requirements changed between 2015 and 2016.” On example: “the 2016 data includes students with disabilities who were exempt from taking a READ assessment in 2015 and in prior years because tests were not accessible.”
[v] CMA PARCC Spring 2016 Achievement Results, http://www.cde.state.co.us/assessment/cmasparccstatesummary2016.

[vi] Colorado Succeeds - Colorado’s 2015 NAEP Results, http://www.coloradosucceeds.org/blog/colorados-2015-naep-results-what-you-need-to-know/.