Friday, February 22, 2019

AV #190 - Why our school needs The Imagine Project – as told by 5th graders



Inviting students to tell their story, safely, in a way that builds trust and offers hope.  


“Our mission is to ensure that all young people (K-12) are provided an opportunity to heal from stress and trauma through high-quality, therapeutic journaling. We give all kids an opportunity to talk about their feelings, process difficult life experiences, and Imagine a new story in their lives…. [We aim] to give kids a voice to bring positive change into their lives, and those of future generations.”  The Imagine Project (https://theimagineproject.org)

What if you attended a faculty meeting after school and the main speakers were fifth graders? What if they made a compelling case for the whole elementary school to take part in a program they had experienced? What if these 10- and 11-year-old boys and girls shared with all of us present that afternoon personal and sometimes painful “Imagine stories”—one outcome of this project? And what if their teachers left both moved and excited, so much so that soon after every one of them, in grades 1-5, asked to bring the project’s 7-step writing tool to their classrooms?

I want you to hear from those fifth graders (page 2), and hope their words, more persuasive than anything I can offer, will make you curious enough to learn more about The Imagine Project.

My introduction came from hearing its founder, Dianne Maroney, RN, MSN—a neighbor here in Parker—speak of her work. And then from reading her book: The Imagine Project - Empowering Kids to Rise Above Drama, Trauma, and Stress, Yampa Valley Publisher, 2018. (Addendum A includes several excerpts.) The more I have learned, the more it strikes me that, if the strategy and the tools in The Imagine Project are fairly simple, the idea behind it is profound. As an educator, it is aligned with what I believe about good schools and the importance of knowing our students well; as a writing teacher, I see it as a great tool to help students find their voice (see Addendum B from previous newsletters). Like those fifth graders, I am now an advocate for this work.

The Imagine Project (founded in 2015) is much more than a school-based program, but schools are my focus—so here are the basics for a classroom.  A teacher might spend 60-90 minutes going through the 7-steps with her class—perhaps best done over several days, or even longer. There are four age-appropriate journal forms: for K-2, 3-5, 6-12, and for adults. It begins as “free writing”—i.e., not to be judged nor graded for spelling or grammar.   

Steps 1 and 2 serve as a warm-up, a kind of brainstorming. The writing begins with Step 3.

Step 3: Imagine
Choose one challenging experience in your life. Tell the story of that experience by beginning each sentence in your story with the word Imagine. Start with your first memory—what do your heart and mind think of first, when you consider that experience?

Step 3 can begin to explore a painful past event, as in these two examples (from The Imagine Project):

By Kate, 5th grader:
Imagine … being friends with a girl one moment and being bullied the next.
Imagine … not knowing what you did.
Imagine … feeling sad and upset.
Imagine … not telling your mom, feeling afraid she might be angry.

By Joseph, 4th grader:
Imagine … you left your country for a better life.
Imagine … you need to travel by train so others don’t see you.
Imagine … you need to walk in the desert for days and days.
Imagine … you need water but you don’t have any for days.

The next step invites the writer into a more hopeful space. What might be. What could be.

Step 4: Possibilities - Now it’s time to imagine new possibilities in your life. What is the ending you would like to have to your Imagine story? Dream big—imagine what you want to do in your life!

Steps 4 -7 takes the writer forward. Maroney believes such expressive writing encourages the student “to process and find meaning from a difficult life circumstance, to let it go, and to create a new story for their lives.  This kind of writing also allows the writer to feel seen, heard, and validated” (The Imagine Project, p. 78).

Those fifth graders at Walnut Hill Elementary School in Cherry Creek must have felt that way, based on their enthusiasm in asking their teachers to bring The Imagine Project to every classroom. The words of the boys and girls—quoted here—seemed natural and honest, and proved effective in leading the faculty to agree.

During the sessions, kids are able to reflect on themselves. They can talk about their struggles, triumphs, and tragedies. Writing about their stories can lead to healing.

It can help kids at Walnut Hills get through their problems that they might be having at school or home or anywhere. For example, a divorce. Some kids have parents who are divorced or getting divorced. The Imagine Project would help those kids see over the arc [of their story] and help them get to the other side of the sadness.

One of our big goals is to show kids that it's ok to be open about what they are going through.

The Imagine Project also helps kids reflect. When kids think about good and bad things in life it can help them see that they can rise above sadness and any other bad feelings they might be having. They can also see that they have been able to get through bad things which can help them see that there is always a way to get through something bad no matter how bad it may feel.

By having kids teach the school about The Imagine Project we want to make them feel like this is a privilege and not an assignment.

… we will be sharing our own Imagine Projects so that they can see everyone goes through this.

There are many good outcomes of thinking about and writing imagine stories. … From kindergarten to 5th grade we think this project will help kids of all ages. …  

My goal: merely to provide an introduction to The Imagine Project, and to ask you to take a look. Education policy and school reform (and no doubt Another View) can feel cold—too much “data-driven analysis,” too little heart. All of us need to be wary of becoming so PARCC, SPF, and PDU-obsessed that we lose our way. The young kids and teenagers walking into our classrooms hope for and need adults who will pay attention to them as individuals. And many are hurting. They need to find a way to share their stories with a trusted adult. When they are allowed to do so, the classroom can become a safe haven, a place where they are known, and an even better place to grow and learn.




Addendum A

The Imagine Project – Empowering Kids to Rise Above Drama, Trauma, and Stress (excerpts)

From Foreword, by Dr. Jerry Yager, Denver Children’s Advocacy Center
Maroney “effectively communicates her understanding of how hard it is to hear young people’s stories, and encourages us to trust that the very act of sharing and having someone present to hear them, see them and know them is healing in and of itself.”
“We cannot get overwhelmed by the challenges we face. We must learn to imagine ourselves collectively, finding innovative, creative solutions. This book offers the reader many resources that can help our children transform their suffering and maximize their resiliency and well-being.”

**
From Introduction
Her own painful experiences led her to wonder: “What if there was a way to help kids who’ve suffered from stress and trauma? Could telling their stories in the Imagine format steer them away from despair and toward hope and healing?”

From Chapter 1 – What is Emotional Wellness?
“… many of us find it extremely difficult to deal with our children’s expressions of painful emotions like sadness, disappointment, and frustration. Because of this, some children—especially teens—go inward and don’t like talking about their feelings to adults. And yet expressing emotion is extremely important. So how can we help children express their emotions?”

From Chapter 4 – The Value of Expressive Writing
“Kids and teens hold so much in their minds and hearts. When troubles are kept under cover, they remain unprocessed, take up too much space, and prevent kids from moving forward. Being ‘stuck’ only perpetuates cycles of dysfunction, such as abuse, addiction, and poverty, generation after generation. Fortunately, expressive writing is an effective tool that can help kids process and let go of their stories so they aren’t defined or limited by them. Expressive writing inspires them to imagine new possibilities ….”

From Chapter 5 – Writing with The Imagine Project
“At first glance teachers and administrators often worry that doing the journaling process will be heavy and hard for students (and teachers), but in most cases, it’s not as difficult as you might think. Instead, it’s profound and inspiring. Will there be tears? Probably, and that’s okay—what a wonderful way to show kids that expressing emotion is permitted and appropriate.”


Addendum B 
Another View (2010, 2013, 2018) and Chalkbeat Colorado (2016)

1.       From AV #65 – A Guiding Principle – Know Your Students Well (July 2010)

  What is most important? What makes the biggest difference for students?  In facing difficult choices—we can’t be all things to all people—what essential principles should guide our thinking? 

Many of us agree on two guiding principles: we want 1) caring, committed, and capable teachers, and 2) a strong curriculum reflecting high standards and expectations. Here is a third principle that might guide us: we need structures that enable the faculty to know their students well. 

I believe the principle of knowing students well should be among our top priorities for several reasons.  The first reason is because it is such a human principle—it is about relationships—and therefore speaks to all parties concerned—parents, educators, and students.  Schools are communities where adults need to show respect for the young people in their trust, where adults need to build connections with and understanding of their students so that they believe: the men and women here do care about me and will treat me as an individual.  Second, in an era of data-driven accountability, it speaks to a factor that may not be measurable—and therefore can easily be discounted—even though our best school leaders constantly remind us that a school’s culture, its ethos, and its values—all related to personalization—are critical to its success. 


2.       From AV #105 – Teaching our students to write: Why I believe we’re headed in the wrong direction -               Writing standards & high school expectations frown on students finding their voice (Dec. 2013)
Welcome the young person – not just the student
  “The children who came into my classrooms were also perceptive—they caught on quickly whether school was going to be a place where they should bring their whole selves, or leave most of themselves at the schoolhouse door.”  Deborah Meier, Nov. 21, 2013, http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/Bridging-Differences.



3.       From Chalkbeat Colorado – “On week one after a tense summer, don’t be afraid to tell students: ‘We want to know you’” (Aug. 2016) https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/co/2016/08/23/on-week-one-after-a-tense-summer-dont-be-afraid-to-tell-students-we-want-to-know-you/

   [Those freshmen entering this high school of 2,000 students] will wonder: Are the men and women in this building on their side? Is any adult there happy to see them?
    In those first days, English teachers will have their own questions about their students’ writing skills and their students’ lives. As a longtime English teacher in Parker, my solution was to embrace the simple journal entry.
    In my final years as a teacher, that first week of school, I asked my students to produce three journal entries. No magic there. But perhaps the big high school becomes less scary when one adult says, I care. I’d like to know who you are and what’s on your mind. Tell me.



4.       From AV #182 Schools & the English classroom; depression & suicide (Aug. 2018)

If I were teaching again this year, I would find it impossible not to be thinking, more than ever, about the mental health of my students….  it feels especially important to acknowledge the emotional struggles of so many of our students, and to ask: what is our responsibility? …

[The Addenda included this quote from LeeAndra Khan, CEO of Civitas Partners, Education Post, June 6, 2018}
Listening Is an Act of Kindness - It’s hard for all of us to do, especially educators [,] but listen with an empathetic heart. Our students are trying to tell us what they need, but the constructs of schooling sometimes prevent us from truly hearing them. When we listen, we open up opportunities to build relationships. When we build relationships, students can feel connected. If they feel connected, they may ask for your help.”

Monday, February 4, 2019

AV#189 - Choosing a school for our kids – what a burden!


… choice policies can also create a tremendous burden for families …
From Commentary in Education Week, by Carolyn Sattin-Bajaj, Sept. 19, 2017

It can be hard to make good choices when there’s an abundance of options. In Washington, D.C., where I live, there are about 200 possibilities, including both charter schools and traditional public schools …. While the lottery makes the application process easier, families still need to shoulder the burden of visiting schools, comparing their offerings, and making an informed decision about which are best.”
From “Six Reasons Why School Choice Won't Save Us” in Forbes, by Natalie Wexler, April 29, 2018

Can freedom become a burden, too heavy for man to bear, something he tries to escape from?”
Erich Fromm, Escape from Freedom

“And they will be glad to believe our answer, for it will save them from the great anxiety and terrible agony they endure at present in making a free decision for themselves.”
Spoken by the Grand Inquisitor, from The Brothers Karamazov, by Fyodor Dostoyevsky


A satire

It is “choice” season for parents in Denver Public Schools. They tell us: “Apply: Create your [SchoolChoice] account here. Then, fill out … submit ….”

“Incoming preschool and kindergarten students must participate ….”

Some choice.

Such a bummer—to have to choose a school for our kids.

Sure I like choosing which supermarket to go to. Glad to know that King Soopers and Safeway aren’t far away, that we can go to Natural Grocers, Sam’s Club, Sprouts, Target, Wild Oats … Can’t tell you exactly why we prefer one—the produce, the cleanliness, the courtesy, knowing we might see friends there ….

But when it comes to schools, the district suggests: “1. First” [First—right away you know they’re going to make it hard!], “First, research DPS schools by reviewing …  2. Prioritize your student’s top preferences and rank them … up to a limit of 12 schools.” 

So much homework! Should I feel guilty if I don’t fulfill all these requirements? 

And who came up with this shopping metaphor for public schools—parents and students as customers? Give me a break.

Of course I like having choices when it comes to the next car. I can laugh at granddad, who called himself a “Chevy man.” He would never buy anything else. His generation was OK back in the old days with the USA's big three. I get why Americans, shopping for a car in, say, 1952, would have resisted the choices we now have from Japan, Germany, and Korea. Not how we see the world, I’m glad to say. Happy we have models from Italy and Sweden as well—and before long, China? And heck, it is fun to look around. Not long after the latest purchase I begin scouting for the next car, even if that’s four or five years down the road ….

But searching through 200 schools to find "the best fit" for our children? Who decided this was supposed to be such a burden? 

I go to the DPS website on choice. It lists 25 Frequently Asked Questions. Half of them confuse me further: “If one of my children ‘choices’ into a school that is not our guaranteed boundary school ….” Good grief. And why all this bragging? Enrollment guides available in 10 languages; “… DPS implemented a unified one-application, one-deadline system to simplify enrollment for families …”; “our online, mobile-friendly application tool.” Friendly? Ha!  

I take a look. Mission, beliefs, goals: “student-centered,” “self-advocacy,” “experiential.” Mumbo jumbo. It gets worse: “empowering students,” “building inclusive relationships,” “hands-on, brains-on curriculum.” I see “traditional” is an option, but who knows what that means these days? Heck, if I could have traditional I’d go back to what works for me: find your neighborhood school and (hit) send.

We changed our cable service again last month. A headache. We investigated so many packagesDISH and Direct TV, Sling and Spectrum, etc.but well worth it. Funny now to think of The Boss, back in the early 90’s, singing about “Fifty-Seven Channels (and Nothin’ On).” In our research we learned we can now have 500 channels, but geez, who needs that many choices? – 250 will do. Something worth watching is always on. We got a good deal. Just committed to two years, though, since all this stuff keeps changing. Maybe in 2021 we’ll find better options.

But back to DPS. Being told to apply is not enough; it is also my duty, apparently, to visit several schools. Like that will happen! Some fool, I see, gives me 15 questions I’m supposed to carry around during a school tour. I must be too dumb to know what I want.

All so irritating, really, as if I’m being told: This Is What Good Parents Will Do. 

I wish the know-it-alls who came up with this convoluted process understood.

You’re demanding too much.

You’re putting the responsibility on us, just to find the right school for our kids.

Such a bummer.


Wednesday, January 23, 2019

AV#188 - School accountability in Colorado



 No need to abandon the School Performance Framework, but it is far from perfect.

Case in point: Paris Elementary and student achievement


“Nearly a decade ago, our state laid a new foundation for evaluating the success of K-12 schools –
 a model that has been replicated across the country….
But the experience of local educators in recent years has made it clear it is time for another shift.”
“It’s time to change Colorado’s school accountability system,”[i]
 The Denver Post, Rebecca Holmes and Lisa Yates, Dec. 19, 2018

That guest commentary made a good case for “rethinking accountability” for our schools, and I cheer on the efforts Holmes and Yates are piloting in a number of districts.[i] Here is perhaps a more basic reason to re-examine our School Performance Framework. Is the most modest growth trumping dismal achievement scores? How else can a school like Paris Elementary be rated on Improvement?

It is mean-spirited to jump on those who are down, and as I see it, Aurora Public Schools and—my focus here—one of its schools, are in grave trouble, so what I write here can be seen as mean. But to know how our students perform is much too important to let this pass. Just as it is vital to know how well our schools are serving our students. For the moment, Colorado’s School Performance Framework remains our guide. But it is surely imperfect, and it can sometimes be wrong.

AV #128 – “Paris Elementary School – 2012-2014 – a narrative” (March 2015) – “An Open Letter to the State Board of Education and the Colorado Department of Education,” was an earlier warning about the school, on Priority Improvement for a second year. It then spent the next three years on Priority Improvement.
Paris Elementary spent five years on Priority Improvement on the state’s School Performance Framework (SPF), and thus approached the end of the accountability clock this past year (see Addendum A). But in December Paris somehow received (I cannot say earned) 42.9 total percent points on the SPF, and it is now rated on Improvement. This is the second highest rating on the state’s SPF.



APS staff: Transparent on results?  APS school board: Curious?[iii] Indifferent? Irresponsible?

Did student performance at Paris improve enough to earn the state’s second highest rating in 2018?  Do not ask the school board at Aurora Public Schools; APS staff prefers not to provide achievement scores to the board. (I have criticized this twice before: “Open Letter to Aurora Public Schools,” Oct. 10, 2017, and last March, AV #177 - APS school board still not being told student achievement data in ACTION Zone.) It was no different earlier this month when staff gave an update on the five schools in the Action ZONE: 15 slides and not one word on student achievement. Unbelievable. See Addendum B.)

[The specific presentation on Aurora Central High School at that board meeting was even more appalling, but ACHS is not my focus. If interested, Addendum C includes some data (the board did not see).]

No easy answers, but consider this—from page 2 of the Final School Performance Framework for Paris Elementary for 2016, and for 2017, and now the most recent one, for 2018.

Paris Elementary School – School Performance Framework – 2016 - 2018

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
Subject
Student Group
Mean Scale Score
Rating


2016
2017
2018
2016
2017
2018
English Language Arts
All students
698.2
707.5
709.3*
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Previously Identified for READ Plan



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

English Learners



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Free/Reduced Lunch Eligible



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Minority Students



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Students with Disabilities



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Math
All students
695.6
697.2
703.0*
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

English Learners



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Free/Reduced Lunch Eligible



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Minority Students



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Students with Disabilities



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Science
All students
457.9
454.9
455.4
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

English Learners



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Free/Reduced Lunch Eligible



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Minority Students



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet

Students with Disabilities



Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
*TO NOTE: State average for ELA, for grades 3-5, close to 743; state average for Math, grades 3-5, close to 737. [iv]
                                             
  DOES NOT MEET on Academic Achievement is based the PARCC/CMAS results. Take a look. 

2018 – PARCC/CMAS - % who met or exceeded expectations – state, district, school[v]


COLORADO
AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
PARIS ELEMENTARY

2016
2017
2018
2016
2017
2018
2016
2017
2018
ELA









Grade 3
37.4
40.1
40.4
18.6
20.4
21.3
8.9
10.7
*
Grade 4
43.9
44.1
46.1
21.2
25.1
26.9
*
11.3
*
Grade 5
41.2
46.3
47.4
21.1
26.0
29.8
*
9.7
12.1










MATH









Grade 3
38.9
40.0
39.1
18.2
20.9
19.6
*
7.1
6.5
Grade 4
33.3
34.0
33.9
14.0
15.6
17.3
*
*
*
Grade 5
34.3
33.6
35.5
13.7
15.0
17.3
*
*
*

* Scores not available, as the number of students is under 16 – BUT IF WE SEE THE PERCENT SCORING IN THE BOTTOM THREE CATEGORIES AT PARIS ELEMENTARY (below), we can see that the missing scores are likely to be similar to those where the scores are available.

APS staff (unwilling to tell the school board such grim news?) offered three bullets about Paris under “Individual School Progress.” It noted that the Median Growth Percentile (MGP) in math improved “by 8.5 points between 2017 and 2018, from 38 to 46.5.”[vi] Yes, these are the numbers on the SPF. But did it? 

And how does a 46.5% MGP in math, a 47% MGP in ELA, and 55% MGP in English Language Proficiency tally up to 54.8% MGP for the school, which apparently is enough to lift Paris to an Improvement rating?

A breakdown on PARCC/CMAS results for Paris – OVER 70% NOT EVEN APPROACHING EXPECTATIONS

The state provides more detail than just the # and % who Met or Exceeded Expectations. It actually reports the # and % of students scoring in each of the five categories, from lowest (Did Not Yet Meet Expectations) to highest (Exceeded Expectations). So even without the data for the number and percentage Meeting Expectations for many grades at Paris, when the far majority of students are scoring in the bottom two categories, it reveals how far most students are from meeting the standards.

2018 – PARCC/CMAS – Paris Elementary – far majority of scores in bottom two categories


% Did Not Yet Meet Expectations
% Partially Met Expectations
% Approaching Expectations
% Met  Expectations
% Exceeded Expectations
ELA





Grade 3
56.5
24.2
*
*
Grade 4
34.9
34.9
*
*
Grade 5
24.2
45.5
18.2
12.1





MATH





Grade 3
48.4
25.8
19.4
6.5
Grade 4
55.6
27.0
*
*
Grade 5
40.0
41.5
*
*
                                                                                                                              
So for both ELA and Math, at least 69.7% (Grade 5, ELA) and as many as 82.6% (Grade 4, Math) of the students at Paris SCORE in the BOTTOM TWO CATEGORIES - a long way from reaching proficiency in these two subjects.

Paris Elementary – hardly alone to earn an Improvement rating with such low achievement

Paris is not the only school to receive fewer than 43% points that is now rated on Improvement. In Aurora, the same is true for three other schools. True as well for other Colorado schools; I list the first dozen one finds on the state’s website–below. But Paris is a school I have followed for several years, and I cannot see how it now deserves to be rated on Improvement. And when other schools where student achievement remains equally troubling—far below the district average, to say nothing of the state average—“earn” an Improvement rating, it invites questions about the validity of the SPF itself.

Schools with less than 43 percentage points earned on the SPF, but rated on Improvement in 2018[vii]


District
School
% points earned
2018 SPF
APS
Kenton Elem.
42.3
Improvement

Lansing Elem.
42.2
Improvement

Paris Elem.
42.9
Improvement

South Middle
42.2
Improvement
Center
Center High
42.2
Improvement
Charter School Institute
Mountain Village Montessori Charter
42.5
Improvement
Colorado Springs
West Elem.
42.6
Improvement
Denver
Cheltenham Elem.
42.3
Improvement

Colfax Elem.
42.6
Improvement


Farrell B. Howard ECE-8
42.8
Improvement


Godsman Elem.
36.4 (???)
Improvement
Englewood
Englewood Middle School
42.8
Improvement


Denver Public Schools has its own SPF and its own (often more rigorous) rating formula.  This sometimes leads the state to drop its final ratings for several DPS schools. Three examples follow. The percentage points earned might have led the state to put the school on Improvement, but DPS was not as lenient. In the end the state SPF “Deferred to district rating” and gave these schools a lower rating.



% points earned
2018 SPF
Notes
DPS
Monarch Montessori
42
Priority Improvement
Deferred to district rating

Stedman Elem.
42.4
Turnaround
Deferred to district rating

STRIVE-GVR
43
Priority Improvement
Deferred to district rating


Help!

I believe the Educator Accountability Act of 2009 (SB 09-163), which led to Colorado’s School Performance Framework, has been, all in all, a positive for our state. Selfishly, Another View has depended heavily on Colorado’s SPF in commenting on school results; I might be compelled to torch much of what I have written over the past ten years if I lose faith that, more often not, it has given us valuable information. I am among those worried that the mounting criticism of the School Performance Framework might go too far. Far better for parents and the public see the results of an honest effort to assess how schools like Paris Elementary and Aurora Central are doing, than to lose hope that it is worth doing at all. Revise it, rename it, fine—but do away with it? Give up on school accountability?

Two “major purposes” of SB-163 included:
·         Creating a fairer, clearer and more effective cycle of support and intervention
·         Enhancing state, district and school oversight of improvement efforts[viii] (emphasis mine)

Although this newsletter points out what must be one egregious error with our SPF, it is a mistake that can be fixed. If our SPF is on thin ice, I have no desire to see it disappear.

My point is more supportive. The SPF, like any human creation, is fallible and sometimes gets it wrong. If the goal has been to help provide better “support and intervention” to our lowest-performing schools and “enhance … oversight of improvement efforts,” the SPF needs to make it clear that schools like Paris Elementary are not doing OK. They do not need the stamp of on Improvement. They need help.



Addendum A

Colorado’s School Performance Framework – 2011-2018 - Paris Elementary School


Overall rating
Points Earned
Academic Achievement
Academic Growth
Academic Growth Gaps
2011
Improvement Plan
48.4%
Does Not Meet
Approaching
Approaching
2012
Priority Improvement
42.0%
Does Not Meet
Approaching
Approaching 
2013
Priority Improvement
40.5%
Does Not Meet
Approaching
Approaching 
2014
Priority Improvement
33.0%
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
Does Not Meet
2016
Priority Improvement
37.7%
Does Not Meet
Approaching
No longer reported
2017
Priority Improvement
40%
Does Not Meet
Approaching
No longer reported
2018
Improvement Plan
42.9%
Does Not Meet
Approaching
No longer reported


Addendum B

District Program Monitoring Report-Update Aurora International Leadership ACTION Zone[ix]

From Section 3, Implementation Progress - Individual School Progress – page 10
Paris:
·         “In math, Paris showed its MGP by 8.5 points between 2016-17 and 2017-18, from 38 to 46.5.
·         “Paris is focused on building a new school culture, as well as onboarding and capacity building of new teaching staff.
·         “Paris has been building community partnerships, including partnering with Children’s Hospital to provide health and wellness programming.”
From Section 6: Goals - page 14
·         “Two schools, Crawford and Paris, improved their overall SPF rating from Priority Improvement to Improvement and therefore are no longer on the State’s Accountability Clock.”

COMMENT:
As with Paris, the “progress” reported for the other schools in the Action Zone, Aurora Central High, Aurora West, Boston K-8, and Crawford Elementary, did not include ONE SENTENCE on academic achievement. Only a little data—mostly improved Median Growth Percentiles. In 15 pages, the report devoted four pages to the budget of Action Zone work in the five schools, most of three pages to demographics, and most of two pages to the School Performance Framework results 2016- 2018. (Yes, I repeat myself.[x]  More troubling is that the APS staff repeats itself, as if no one notices. Some of us do.)


Addendum C

Aurora Central High School – Achievement and Accountability

1.       Is ONE LINE on academic achievement enough?

“Aurora Central High School Board Update”[i] - presented by the principal, Gerardo De La Garza, January 9, 2019

The update pertained to the board’s decision to approve the ACHS Unified Improvement Plan (UIP) before being submitted to CDE. No SAT or PSAT scores, no achievement data at all, except for ONE LINE.

Principal De La Raza presented eight slides in his presentation. They included data showing improvement on attendance, suspensions and expulsions, graduation and dropout rates, and one graph that emphasized how the SPF scores for the high school had grown, 2016-2018. That graph also included an orange line on the Academic Achievement from the SPF each of the last three years.  ONE LINE.

Aurora Central High – overall SPF scores and specific Academic Achievement scores




2016
2017
2018
SPF rating
31.8% points earned
34.8% points earned
37.4% points earned
Academic Achievement
25%
7.5/30 (weighted points earned/pts eligible)
Does Not Meet
25%
7.5/30 (weighted points earned/pts eligible)
Does not Meet
25%
7.5/30 (weighted points earned/pts eligible)
Does not Meet


But did the board hear anything about that 25% and Does Not Meet for three straight years?

No doubt the Unified Improvement Plan itself included a more complete and self-critical examination if its struggles to see student achievement improve. Perhaps something along the lines of what we read in the school’s UIP from 2017:

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
Description: The 9th and 10th grade achievement scores, for all disaggregated groups, are persistently below state expectations in evidence-based reading and writing as well as math. The percentage of students reaching proficiency is consistently below state and district averages, resulting in a total SPF rating of “Does Not Meet.”

What is the basis of the 7.5/30?  As high schools no longer take a PARCC test, achievement data is derived from results on the two “college readiness” exams, the SAT and PSAT.  I heard an ACHS teacher insist that such tests are a poor way to measure academic achievement at a high school like ACHS. I agree. But it is what we have.  Shouldn’t we expect the school board to be given these scores?


2017
2018

English
Math
English
Math
Minimum expected for graduation*
470
500
470
500
ACHS
423.6
405.3
422.2
409.5
Below minimum
      -46.4
-94.7
-47.8
-90.5
*Colorado Graduation Guidelines as of 2021[xii]

Does the Aurora School Board see this kind of data? Does it ask for it? Is the Board even interested?

All it saw earlier this month were eight slides from the principal. Not enough, not when the school is …


     2.  One of 3 high schools in Colorado on YEAR 8 on the ACCOUNTABILITY CLOCK

There are only THREE Colorado schools serving grades 9-12 on YEAR 8 in the state’s School Performance Framework.  The just released 2018 SPF rating shows that, of those three, the Colorado high school with the fewest percentage points earned is Aurora Central High School.

2018 – School Performance Framework – percentage points earned:
-          Aguilar Junior-Senior High School – 41.8%
-          Adams City High – 39.5%
-          Aurora Central High – 37.4%




[iii] AV#141–“Sherlock Holmes for Superintendent. Curiosity–a key ingredient for better schools,” included this:
Dec. 11 - PARCC scores in Aurora – Sherlock would take out his magnifying glass to see if ….
Six weeks later, when the PARCC results were published, one did not expect APS leaders to be pleased. But were they curious?  Any information there to learn from?  School-by-school data to dig into?
Chalkbeat Colorado - Aurora: ‘We know we need to do better.’
Of the state’s top 20 districts, the troubled Aurora Public Schools district posted the lowest scores on the PARCC tests: 20 percent of students met or exceeded expectations in language arts, and just 12 percent met those marks in math. (Jan. 2016)
[vi]From “District Program Monitoring Report-Update Aurora International Leadership ACTION Zone,” for APS school board, Jan. 8, 2019.
[x] From, AV#177 – “APS school board still not being told student achievement data in Action Zone,” on the Action Zone report to school board in January 2018:
“14 pages. Too much? Yes, when of so little value. After ‘Background’ and ‘Program Status,’ this:
·         4 pages on the budget
·         2 pages on demographic data
·         1 page on enrollment
·         2 pages on School Performance Framework targets and results. (My version of the SPFs, p. 4, provides a new board more context—previous years—to show how chronic the low performance has been.)
·         1 page on ‘Individual School Progress,’ providing growth scores (a repeat of what the previous board saw on 9/19), but no data on the achievement results on PARCC or PSAT assessments to gauge student performance for 2016-17.  A good board understands what growth scores do not reveal.” (Emphasis mine.)
[xi] From “Aurora Central High School Board Update” at the Aurora School Board meeting, Jan. 8, 2019, https://www.boarddocs.com/co/aurora/Board.nsf/files/B82TNH6C1A9A/$file/ACHS%20BOE%20Presentation%2C%20January%208%2C%202018.pdf