Monday, April 26, 2021

AV#230 - If education is not “training for the workforce,” then what is it? 13 answers

 

“The Business of Education - is Education” – continued. 

A follow-up to AV#229, Sinclair Lewis’s Babbitt - cautionary words from 100 years ago


Excerpts and Quotes – on the purpose of education (2018-2021)

Comment on Another View #229: “You can’t just criticize; it’s not enough to whine about the market-based, business-oriented influence on public education’s mission. How about a positive affirmation of our mission?”

                                                                                                                                                                                          

I have tried before. See Addendum, page 6, from AV#156 and AV#180. Here is another attempt.

I like to collect statements that offer a compelling vision of what education is for; of why we teach; of all we hope to provide young people in schools and in college. These statements are more traditional and, as I said before, “less monetary and mundane” than what is au courant: “training for the workforce.” I hope the four pages that follow raise our sights. I hope they remind us of time-honored hopes and beliefs. I hope they might even inspire future teachers. It is a noble profession. It is not just about career prep.

Critics will call the affirmations here old-fashioned. Not relevant (a popular charge). Or (warning – this will get a little wordy) TONE DEAF to the completely REASONABLE demand from the business community that education be PRACTICAL, that schools need to wake up (woke up?) to THE REAL WORLD and give students a chance to experience the PLANT/OFFICE/FACTORY before they graduate from high school (even though they will have another 45 YEARS OR MORE TO BE IN THE WORKPLACE AFTER THEY GRADUATE, but never mind, HERE’S A CHANCE TO GET THEM out of school and INTO OUR BUSINESSES ASAP, so that we can TRAIN THEM, so that they will graduate from high school – CAREER READY.  

Most of the arguments, beliefs, and examples that follow probably look familiar. Isn’t this what most of us heard from our elders as we were going through school? I cannot think of one K-12 teacher who talked about the workplace. In college, as an English major who took a number of Religion courses, only in one course (ED 376: Sociology of Education), as I recall, did the curriculum spend a minute on any career.   

Have our fundamental beliefs about the purpose of education changed so much in a generation or two?         

                                 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Descriptions of the purpose of education from passages that follow:

“to lead a fulfilled life                   a way to realize individual possibility”              intellectual flexibility”

“better able to function in a democracy”   “classroom experiences that reckon with the purpose of life”

“…the business of liberal education in a democracy is to make free people wise.” 

“… both academic training and preparation to live a meaningful and fulfilled life.”

“…we need knowledgeable, informed citizens who can guide this country in the proper direction.” 

“My students are learning to read, write, and multiply …

because those skills will help them navigate and understand the world.”  

what [parents] really care about … is that their kids are happy, have good lives,

and that they are fulfilled…”

_______________________________________________________________________________________________


A higher purpose - “Start with Why” (Simon Sinek)

FROM SCHOOLS AND TEACHERS

“Kids hear adults describe them as lazy and selfish. I see my students being kind every day,” by Kyle Schwartz, Chalkbeat Colorado, Aug. 22, 2019.

 

It would be presumptuous of me to suggest the ideas here reflect the “true” purpose of school and college. See “The Many Purposes of Education”*—listing sevendifferent point(s) of view concerning what education should be all about.” My goal is to encourage readers to consider that we may have taken a detour, to ask if the current WHY isn’t small-minded and short-sighted, and to reflect on what might be a more meaningful purpose than the one that has taken hold of late.  *https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-the-aim-of-education-8417

   Have you ever asked a child why they are in school? As a third-grade teacher, I ask this question to my students each year. Their answers seem to follow a script. Almost every child will answer confidently that they go to school so they can learn. If you ask a child why they need to learn, many will tell you it’s so they can get good grades. Then, they might add, they will need good grades in order to go to college or so they can get a good job.                                                                         
   This thinking is so prevalent that it is rarely challenged. Workforce training, while certainly a benefit of schooling,  is not the goal of education. My students are learning to read, write, and multiply not so they can ace a test or snag a job, but because those skills will help them navigate and understand the world. I tell my students, “You are not here so you can make money in a decade. You are here so you can make a difference now.” The obligation of the school is to teach, but the obligation of the student is to contribute. 

(Kyle Schwartz is a third-grade teacher at Doull Elementary in Denver. Excerpted from I Wish for Change: Unleashing the Power of Kids to Make a Difference.)  https://co.chalkbeat.org/2019/8/22/21108696/kids-hear-adults-describe-them-as-lazy-and-selfish-i-see-my-students-being-kind-every-day

**               

“Parents . . . Shifted Their Definition of Success” - Summit Schools cofounder Diane Tavenner on the secrets of student happiness, Education Next, Spring 2020. 

Senior editor, Paul E. Peterson, recently interviewed Diane Tavenner, cofounder and chief education officer of Summit Schools, and author of Prepared: What Kids Need for a Fulfilled Life. 

   Believe it or not, not everyone wants to go to Harvard. What’s better is when students find a good fit that matches who they are: for economic reasons, geographic reasons, their future aspirations, all of those things. When you think about what each individual wants and help them drive toward that outcome, versus a single outcome for a select few, you can help everyone succeed. 

I can see that you can persuade students of that, but how about their parents? Their definition of success may be much more competitive than the one you’re describing here. How do you explain your mission to the parents?

    One of the things we have discovered as we’ve shared the Summit model in 40 states through the Summit Learning Program, and in conversation with parents across the country, is that parents actually have shifted their definition of success. It’s still important to them that their kids have economic stability in their adult lives, but [from podcast] “what they really care about in addition to that is that their kids are happy, have good lives, and that they are fulfilled … and have good relationships and all those things.”

   Most parents think other parents have a much more traditional definition of success that’s about status, power, and wealth, so they are quiet about their beliefs because they think they aren’t shared. The primary reason I wrote the book was to help parents realize they’re not alone. In fact, the parents who want their kids to be happy are a majority in this country.     

 

All organizations start with WHY, but only the great ones keep their WHY clear year after year. Those who forget WHY they were founded show up to the race every day to outdo someone else instead of to outdo themselves. The pursuit, for those who lose sight of WHY they are running the race, is for the medal to beat someone else.          Start with Why, Simon Sinek

   As parents, we need to be open and vocal about this. We’re hoping to build a movement and let the world know that lots of people believe in this new idea of success and how we should be preparing kids for the future.

This is an edited excerpt from an Education Exchange podcastwhich can be heard here. https://www.educationnext.org/parents-shifted-their-definition-of-success-diane-tavenner-interview/

**

 


From “How We Achieve Student Success,” Letter to the Editor, by Andrew Goldin, Chief Program Officer, Summit Learning Program, Education Week, Jan. 16, 2019.

   Our vision is to equip every student to succeed in college and lead a fulfilled life. Our approach to teaching and learning, which we call Summit Learning, is designed to put students on this path by fostering mastery of content knowledge, lifelong problem-solving skills, and habits that lead to success—like goal-setting and perseverance.

**

FROM COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

“A Progressive Defends Liberal Education,” by Peggy Noonan, The Wall Street Journal (Aug. 31-Sept. 1, 2019).

   Noonan praises The Assault on American Excellence (2019), by Anthony Kronman, professor and former Dean at Yale Law School. She writes of his “idea that has largely been lost … that higher education is a fundamentally moral enterprise whose purpose is to help students become better human beings. Universities should be devoted not only to the ‘transmission of skills’ but the ‘shaping of souls.’”

   “The vocational approach,” Noonan writes, “involves the idea that life is all about work and the business of higher education is to prepare you for a profession. This approach … has a restricted sense of excellence. It asks, Kronman says, ‘What do I need to learn to be a successful lawyer or computer scientist?’ and ignores the more important, ‘What makes a whole life honorable and fulfilling?’”

** 

“We Can’t Afford to Lose the Liberal Arts,” interview with Fred Beuttler, associate dean of the Graham School of Continuing Liberal and Professional Studies at the University of Chicago, Inside Academe, American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA), 2018-19, No. 2.

The purpose of the liberal arts: “Former Dean of the College, F. Champ Ward, who helped oversee the University’s Basic Liberal Education for Adults program, looked at what the purpose of a liberal education is. He said that ‘Humans are born equal, but they are not born wise. Therefore, the business of liberal education in a democracy is to make free people wise.’ And that, to me, is the purpose of what we do. Ward said that in 1946, understanding very clearly the need for education for citizenship, to develop a wise people who are capable of self-governance.”

The liberal arts and citizenship: “If you go back to the purpose that Plato sees in [the liberal arts] in The Republic, it is self-governance. The liberal arts are for one’s own personal self-governance. But in a democracy, it becomes even more essential that citizens are capable of governing themselves and seeing the broad picture—and the best way to do that is through a liberal arts education.”  https://www.goacta.org/wp-content/uploads/ee/download/inside-academe-vol.xxiv-no2_.pdf

**

“Andrew Delbanco - A professor and foundation leader wants to expand study of humanities and encourage students to consider the purpose of life,” by Emily Borrow, The Wall Street Journal, Dec. 19-20, 2020.

    “I have this old-fashioned view that the classroom experience can actually give young people a better self-understanding and a greater awareness of the world around them,” [Delbanco] says. When students read great texts together, whether they are wrestling with the difference between love and desire in Shakespeare or considering Hannah Arendt’s analysis of totalitarianism, they ultimately learn how to think and listen to competing points of view. This makes them better able to function in a democracy, he says, “which, as we are often reminded of now, is a hard thing to do.’”

   As president of the Teagle Foundation, which supports liberal arts education, he is working to revive a humanities-based general education on colleges across the country. Together with the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Teagle Foundation is sponsoring a $7 million grant program over five years to expand access to classroom experiences that reckon with the purpose of life.

   “If 2021 has taught us anything,” he says, it’s that “we need to be able to have a reflective, deliberative conversation about who we want to be.”

**

Clayton M. Christensen (1952-2020) – “Professor Turned His Life Into a Case Study,” Obituary in The Wall Street Journal, Jan. 25-26, 2020.

    In a 2010 article and lecture, “How Will You Measure Your Life?,” … [Christensen] advised business-school students to devote part of their time to creating a strategy for living a good life. Having a clear purpose mattered more than mastering core competence and disruptive innovations, he said.

**

“The Great Divide,” book review of two books by Edward Fawcett, Conservatism and Liberalism, by William Anthony Hay, The Wall Street Journal, Dec. 5-6, 2020.

    “The German statesman Wilhelm von Humboldt saw education as a way to realize individual possibility rather than, as tradition would have it, train for an occupation or a social role.”

**

“Scott Millar on University Governance,” Inside Academe, ACTA, 2018-19, No. 3

What is your view of the future of higher education and what can trustees bring to that?

   “… Higher education is heading in new directions. There are certainly revenue and expenditure challenges on the horizon. But at the end of the day, we need knowledgeable, informed citizens who can guide this country in the proper direction. And higher education is the way to ensure that future generations have the proper knowledge, the proper intellect, the proper analytical ability, and the proper decision-making ability in order to make prudent, good, and reasonable decisions for the future of this Commonwealth and the future of this country.”

(Scott Millar is a member of the Board of Visitors at Christopher Newport University.) https://www.goacta.org/wp-content/uploads/ee/download/inside-academe-vol.xxiv-no3_.pdf

**

“Featured Donor - Dr. Harold Eickoff,” Inside Academe, ACTA, 2018-19, No. 4.

   “Like ACTA, Dr. Eickhoff emphasizes that a comprehensive education includes both academic training and preparation to live a meaningful and fulfilled life.”    

(Dr. Eickoff was President of The College of New Jersey, 1979-1998) https://www.goacta.org/wp-content/uploads/ee/download/inside-academe-volxxiv-no.4.pdf

**

“What Happens at College Doesn’t Stay at College, The Current Campus and Its Impact on Society,” Inside Academe, ACTA, 2019-20, No. 1.

   Eugene Hickok, former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Education, opened the panel by outlining how commoditization has ‘removed the soul’ from higher education. Co-driven by both students and institutions, the view of a college education as a consumer product has kept costs high and returns low. https://www.goacta.org/2019/11/inside-academe-vol-xxv-no-1/

** 

“The Most Contrarian College in America,” by Frank Bruni, The New York Times, Sept. 11, 2018.  “What’s the highest calling of higher education? St. John’s College has some enduring answers.”

(My graduate degree is a Master of Arts in Liberal Education, 1990, from St. John’s, Santa Fe, N.M.)

    St. John’s College, which was founded in 1696 in Annapolis, Md., is the third-oldest college in America and, between its campus there and the one here [Santa Fe], has about 775 undergraduates. And I’m drawing attention to it because it’s an increasingly exotic and important holdout against so many developments in higher education — the stress on vocational training, the treatment of students as fickle consumers, the elevation of individualism over a shared heritage — that have gone too far. It’s a necessary tug back in the other direction.

   “Your work and career are a part of your life,” Dean Walter Sterling said when I met with him and the Santa Fe president, Mark Roosevelt. “Education should prepare you for all of your life. It should make you a more thoughtful, reflective, self-possessed and authentic citizen, lover, partner, parent and member of the global economy.”   https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/11/opinion/contrarian-college-stjohns.html

 


CITIZENSHIP

 

Published on Martin Luther King Day, Jan. 18, 2021 – not long after the storming of the U.S. Capitol. 

“How MLK’s views shaped my personal journey in the field of education,” by Corey Edwards, Your Hub, The Denver Post. Rather than quote MLK’s “I Have a Dream” speech, Edwards points to “lesser-known wisdom” from King—in a piece he wrote as an undergraduate at Morehouse College in 1947. As Edwards puts it:

   “Wisdom that resonates deeply with me because of the career I’ve chosen, and the transformational impact this wisdom has had on my own life and the lives of many other people across the country… I point to a particular passage [from that essay, entitled ‘The Purpose of Education’] that unfortunately is as relevant today as it was when it was published.”

Education must also train one for quick, resolute and effective thinking. To think incisively and to think for one's self is very difficult. We are prone to let our mental life become invaded by legions of half truths, prejudices, and propaganda. At this point, I often wonder whether or not education is fulfilling its purpose. A great majority of the so-called educated people do not think logically and scientifically. Even the press, the classroom, the platform, and the pulpit in many instances do not give us objective and unbiased truths. To save man from the morass of propaganda, in my opinion, is one of the chief aims of education. Education must enable one to sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false, the real from the unreal, and the facts from the fiction. The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. (Martin Luther King, Jr.)

(Edwards only quoted half of this passage; I added the rest of the quote to more fully reflect King’s statement on education’s purpose.) Edwards is the northwestern director for Western Governors University. https://yourhub.denverpost.com/blog/2021/01/how-mlks-views-shaped-one-coloradans-personal-journey-in-the-field-of-education/273029/


Addendum

From previous issues of Another View – a more inspiring vision for the purpose of education.

     AV #156 - 2071 – Department of Workforce Development – A History – (Jan. 9, 2017)

                                         from Addendum (pages 18-21)

1.      Is education's foremost mission to train the state's workforce?

Steven Fesmire, Letter to the Editor, Education Week, Jan. 20, 2016

2.      Forcing college kids to ignore the liberal arts won't help them in a competitive economy.

Steven Pearlstein, The Washington Post, Sept. 2, 2016 (excerpts)

3.      For the Sake of Humanity, Teach the Humanities - Liberal arts education is essential to good   citizenship -

Jim Haas, Commentary, Education Week, Nov. 14, 2016 (excerpts)

4.      The big threat on campus - Ramesh Ponnuru, Bloomberg View, Dec. 5, 2016

5.      Bill Ivey's book: Handmaking America - Barry Hessenius, Barry’s Blog, Oct. 14, 2012

6.      Character-Building Beats Out Economy-Building as Goal

Catherine Gewertz, News in Brief, Education Week, Feb. 26, 2014

7.      The Heart of the Matter, a report of the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences, 

American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2013 (excerpts)


    

                                                  **


AV #180 - Mission statements from 10 high-performing [COLORADO] schools*–education for LIFE                                                                              (June 12, 2018)

Character, Values, Citizenship, and - no surprise - not a word about training for the workplace

*The Classical Academy (Academy 20); DSST: College View; DSST: Stapleton; DSST: Green Valley; KIPP - Northeast Denver Leadership Academy; Liberty Common Charter School (Poudre); Peak to Peak Charter School (Boulder); STRIVE Prep – Rise (DPS); Twin Peaks Charter Academy (St. Vrain); Vanguard School of Colorado Springs (Cheyenne Mountain).


No comments:

Post a Comment