Tuesday, August 11, 2015

AV#132 - Include World War II in our state's history standards

for my dad – 1926-2015

From Colorado Academic Standards - Social Studies
 High School Content Area: Social Studies Grade Level Expectations
History: “Concepts and skills students master” – includes several sections.
Under “The key concepts of continuity and change, cause and effect, complexity, unity and diversity over time,” we read:
f.   United States history (Reconstruction to the present):
g.  Analyze continuity and change in eras over the course of United States history 
h.  Investigate causes and effects of significant events in United States history. Topics to include but
not limited to WWI, Great Depression, Cold War.…                                                                    (page 29)

“Go to our standards and do a search for World War II.  Search for Roosevelt, Churchill, Hitler. 
Try Pearl Harbor, D-Day, Hiroshima, A-Bomb. Nothing. Zip.”
“You think something is missing? In Colorado we can’t ask students to know about World War II?”
*From Another View #76  (Feb. 28, 2011): “Colorado scores an F on our history standards – and what we can do about it.”   At my AV web site: https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=1829681342965014641#allposts

There is a more personal reason I return to my complaint that Colorado’s history standards fail to mention World War II.  This time, I hope that enough folks will insist that this change.

It is not simply that next month we remember the end of the war, August 1945, 70 years ago.

World War II – It still mattered
As a boy, I saw him reading from Churchill’s Second World War Series. At age 20, in 1969, I understand (now) that he saw Vietnam though the lens of WW II, as I did not, which created conflicts for us. In my 60’s, I have joined him to watch (he listened—with his macular degeneration, the TV screen was largely a blur) WW II documentaries on the History Channel. And many DVD’s—on Churchill, Roosevelt, Ike, George Marshall (a hero of my father’s). This past March, perhaps our final time, on the D-Day landing.  He seemed near tears, shaking his head, commenting—“so many getting slaughtered.” His generation.  His war. 
Seventy years ago this spring my dad was completing his junior year in high school, but he was desperate to do what he could in the war effort.  He was 18.  After being hit in the head with a baseball at age 13, there were two operations on his brain and a year out of school, so the military branches disqualified him. But he had buddies his age off fighting.  President Franklin Roosevelt died in April. The war in Europe ended in May. Still, no one knew how much longer before the Allies could defeat Japan.  Dad managed to sign up with the American Field Service (AFS).  By June 1945 he was on his way to the India-Burma theater of war.  
                                   
My dad passed away this spring, age 88. I informed the AFS, as I was eager to see that he was given recognition for his time in India. (In its annual publication, AFS Janus, a section is reserved for “AFS WW II Ambulance Drivers Last Post.” Photos of the young men; a paragraph about their recent death—ages 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92.) 

One can say my father’s service made little difference. He told us of talk that the AFS might be needed in Japan—or even China … but in the end, not much to tell.

Letter from Dad (June 1994), when my parents went to France: “Normandy beaches–including ‘Pointe du Hoc’–a key point in the invasion and a place Eisenhower visited in 1964 and Reagan in 1984. The cemetery with over 9,000 white crosses. A few red noses including mine!” 
I admire the fact that he jumped in as soon as he could. He did what he was allowed to do. And it was not easy; he suffered a bad case of malaria there that summer of 1945.

Was he envious of those who could call themselves veterans, as he could not?  Of his older brother, who flew three tours in the South Pacific as a fighter pilot in the U.S. Marine Corps?
                                                                                                             
Whatever, it mattered to my dad that he did what he could.  

What I can do, in my education world in Colorado, is protest once more than World War II is not mentioned in the history standards in our state, and to ask—before all who served then have left us—that we correct this.  I expect a number who remain active might feel this is one more battle, however small, worth a fight.

But who cares - as long as most Colorado schools do teach WW II?

Content and Rigor Conclusion 
Colorado’s K–12 Academic Standards in social studies provide virtually no subject-specific content in U.S. history. There is hardly anything in U.S. history that teachers are specifically required to know or to teach at any particular grade level. A complete lack of specific content means that substantive rigor cannot be identified, measured, or evaluated. Even a few vague and brief references to specific eras or concepts cannot raise the score above a zero out of seven for Content and Rigor. http://www.edexcellencemedia.net/publications/2011/20110216_SOSHS/SOSS_USHistory_Colorado.pdf










The Colorado Academic Standards for Social Studies (adopted - December 10, 2009) are essentially* unchanged since I wrote Another View #76 over four years ago (*Corrections were made October 2014).  I stand by my argument then and will not repeat myself (except, see box, one key quote from the critical review on our standards by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute).  In AV#76 I quoted from Fritz Fischer, professor of history and the University of Northern Colorado and chairman of the National Council for History Education. Fischer’s defense: “Colorado officials are prohibited from dictating curricula to school districts.”  I remain skeptical that “local control” is a sound reason why state standards will not include what may be the most significant single event of the 20th century.

Standards for teaching WW II
1.          DPS …………………………….  p. 3
2.          Jefferson County
3.          Cherry Creek
4.          Mesa County Valley
5.          Colorado Springs 11…….. p. 4
6.          Durango
7.          Boulder Valley
8.          Pueblo City Schools
South Carolina history standards  p. 5 Massachusetts history standards  p. 6
Does it even matter what our state standards do or do not say, when a look at the history guidelines in a number of districts around Colorado (see next two pages) makes it clear that World War II is taught, nearly everywhere we look?  (Disturbing, though, to see “modern” U. S. History in Pueblo - #8 below – does not touch 1939-1945.)  Maybe it’s fair to ask: who cares if our state guidelines are indifferent about this, as long as we have the assurance that—in practice—Colorado schools expect high school graduates to have a good understanding of WW II?

We should care. Especially when most districts adopt the Colorado Academic Standards as their guide.  We can do better.  Are the examples provided from South Carolina and Massachusetts too specific for our local control state? Perhaps.
But it is wrong, and embarrassing, that Colorado’s expectations do not even mention World War II.


Another View, a newsletter by Peter Huidekoper, represents his own opinion and is not intended to represent the view of any organization he is associated with.  Comments are welcome. 303-757-1225 / peterhdkpr@gmail.com



Reminder: standards do not “dictate curriculum”

The fear that state standards lead to micromanagement of classroom instruction is nonsense, as teachers know.  Choice abounds.  The Colorado Academic Standards - including those for language arts and math that reflect Common Core guidelines - are deliberately vague.  Colorado’s design principles of the standards start “with the competencies of prepared high school graduates, to create learning expectations for what students should understand, know, and be able to do at each grade level and in each content area.” To insist that World War II is essential to a K-12 education in Colorado is consistent with that.  It is not “dictating curriculum.”  http://www.cde.state.co.us/communications/instructionalprioritiesfactsheet

District standards on World War II in Colorado

Here is an overview of what we see from several districts, including a few high school course descriptions.  What districts require in U.S. History courses usually includes World War II.

The standards in our two largest school districts are specific about the teaching of World War I:

1.       DPS - High School U.S. History World War I and World War II
(Students will know…) What facts and basic concepts should students know and be able to recall?
· Basic characteristics of political ideologies, including democracy, communism, fascism, and Nazism
· How World Wars I and II brought the United States into the modern age as a world power
· How the growth of technology leads to conflict and/or cooperation
· Basic geography of World Wars I and II
· How economic conditions drove lack of compromise and cooperation (for example, World War II resulted from economic conditions imposed at end of World War I)
· Academic language: isolationism, totalitarianism, militarism, nationalism, imperialism, alliance system, appeasement, Manhattan Project, military technology, Treaty of Versailles, Koramatsu vs. United States, zoot suit riots, Japanese internment, Patriot Act, Munich Pact, Holocaust, Rosie the Riveter, League of Nations, United Nations
· Key players: Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR), Adolf Hitler, Hideki Tojo, Woodrow Wilson, Winston Churchill, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Vladimir Lenin, Douglas McArthur, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Tuskegee Airman, George Clemenceau, Jeannette Rankin

2.       Jefferson County - Curriculum by Grade  - 10th grade – Modern U.S. History
Jeffco’s guidelines for grade 10 appear to cover the 20th century.  We see six major units during the year, including three units that— lead up to, include, and then deal with the outcomes of the war: “1920s and 1930s (20-24 days),” “World War II (23 - 31 Days),” and “Post WWII and the Cold War (25-30 days).”

3.       Some districts offer specifics in their Course Curriculum Maps.  Here is what Boulder states for its  US History class:
Evidence Outcome: Investigate the causes and effects of WWI and WWII
Key themes and Topics: WWI and WW II
Total war
Causes of US Involvement
The home front
Peace processes
Key terms and vocabulary, which includes:
fascism, internationalism, American neutrality, causes of WW II, Jewish immigration, US role in WW II (European and Pacific), Japanese internment, wartime economy, daily life in wartime, the Manhattan Project, Declaration of Human Rights….
However, at their web site most districts refer to the state standards.

4.       Cherry Creek School District: “In 2011, after an extensive review and recommendation by teachers and administrators, the Board of Education adopted the Colorado Academic Standards.”


5.       Mesa County Valley School District 51 (Grand Junction) simply states that:
“content in District 51 classes are guided by CDE Colorado K-12 Academic Standards.”

 

6.       Colorado Springs 11 just presents the Colorado Academic Standards. See Colorado Springs School District 11, Instruction, Curriculum and Student Services                       http://www.d11.org/Instruction/Pages/AcademicStandards.aspx

7.       Others, like Durango, suggest they might have their own standards: “We will design and deliver district-wide curriculum and assessment, based on standards of excellence that integrate 21st century skills across disciplines.”  But if you then go to the link for social studies guidelines, you see the Colorado Academic Standards. https://sites.google.com/a/durango.k12.co.us/curriculum_docs/social-studies

On occasion, the district standards, incredibly, still reflect state’s standards prior to 2009
8.       See Pueblo City Schools, under Academic Content Standards, for History:
§  Understand the chronological organization of history.
§  Know how to use the processes and resources of historical inquiry.
§  Understand that societies are diverse and have changed over time.
§  Understand how science, technology, and economic activity have affected societies.
§  Understand political institutions and theories.
§  Know that religious/philosophical ideas have been a powerful force.

The district does require a U.S. History course for graduation. Course #2200 includes this one sentence description:
U.S. History II is a continuation of U.S. History I and is a study of the United States history from Industrialization to World War II and Cold War.

It appears, though, that Course #2860, an elective for juniors and seniors, could be the only U.S History course they take, one that covers what took place after WW II:
Modern U.S. History is designed to develop critical thinking and analysis of issues within the United States and of issues that relate to the rest of the world from the Cold War to present day.
Apparently, one can graduate from a Pueblo City high school without having studied World War II.  

From two other states – can Colorado adopt some of these specifics?
SOUTH CAROLINA – The only state given a straight A for its history standards
(The Thomas Fordham 2011 study)

GRADE 7 - Contemporary Cultures: 1600 to the Present

Standard 7-4: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the causes and effects of world conflicts in the first half of the twentieth century.
Enduring Understanding
The influence of both world wars and the worldwide Great Depression are still evident. To understand the effects these events had on the modern world, the student will utilize the knowledge and skills set forth in the following indicators:
Indicators
7-4.4  Compare the ideologies of socialism, communism, fascism, and Nazism and their influence on the rise of totalitarian governments after World War I in Italy, Germany, Japan, and the Soviet Union as a response to the worldwide depression.
7-4.5  Summarize the causes and course of World War II, including drives for empire, appeasement and isolationism, the invasion of Poland, the Battle of Britain, the invasion of the Soviet Union, the Final Solution, the Lend-Lease program, Pearl Harbor, Stalingrad, the campaigns in North Africa and the Mediterranean, the D-Day invasion, the island-hopping campaigns, and the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
7-4.6  Analyze the Holocaust and its impact on European society and Jewish culture, including Nazi policies to eliminate the Jews and other minorities, the Nuremberg trials, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the rise of nationalism in Southwest Asia (Middle East), the creation of the state of Israel, and the resultant conflicts in the region.            (PAGE 57)


High School Standards for Social Studies
UNITED STATES HISTORY AND THE CONSTITUTION – (Required)

Standard USHC-7: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the impact of World War II on the United States and the nation’s subsequent role in the world.
Enduring Understanding
In defense of democracy, a government may need to confront aggression and ask its citizens for
sacrifice in wars and providing foreign aid that, in turn, affects the practice of democracy at
home. To make informed political decisions about when and how government should go to war,
the student will utilize the knowledge and skills set forth in the following indicators:
Indicators
USHC-7.1 Analyze the decision of the United States to enter World War II, including the nation’s movement from a policy of isolationism to international involvement and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
USHC-7.2 Evaluate the impact of war mobilization on the home front, including consumer sacrifices, the role of women and minorities in the workforce, and limits on individual rights that resulted in the internment of Japanese Americans.
USHC-7.3 Explain how controversies among the Big Three Allied leaders over war strategies led to post-war conflict between the United States and the USSR, including delays in the opening of the second front in Europe, the participation of the Soviet Union in the war in the Pacific, and the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
USHC-7.4 Summarize the economic, humanitarian, and diplomatic effects of World War II, including the end of the Great Depression, the Holocaust, the war crimes trials, and the creation of Israel.  (PAGE 111)         

MASSACHUSETTS – One of five states given an A- for its history standards
(The Thomas Fordham 2011 study)

Massachusetts History and Social Science Curriculum Framework    http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/hss/final.pdf

Grades 8–12 World History I and II: 500 to 2001

In World History I, students … examine the causes and consequences of the great military and economic events of the past century, including World War I, the Great Depression, World War II, the Cold War, the Russian and Chinese revolutions, the rise of nationalism, and the continuing persistence of political, ethnic, and religious conflict in many parts of the world.      (PAGE 56)

U.S. History I and II: 1763–2001
In U.S. History I, students … learn about the various factors that led to America’s entry into World War I and World War II as well as the consequences of World War II for American life.  (PAGE 72)

U.S. History II Learning Standards (continued)

World War II, 1939–1945

14 - Explain the strength of American isolationism after World War I and analyze its impact on U.S. foreign policy.
15 - Analyze how German aggression in Europe and Japanese aggression in Asia contributed to the start of World War II and summarize the major battles and events of the war. On a map of the world, locate the Allied powers (Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States) and Axis powers (Germany, Italy, and Japan). 

A.  Fascism in Germany and Italy
B.  German rearmament and militarization of the Rhineland
C.  Germany’s seizure of Austria and Czechoslovakia and Germany’s invasion of Poland
D.  Japan’s invasion of China and the Rape of Nanking
E.  Pearl Harbor, Midway, D-Day, Okinawa, the Battle of the Bulge, Iwo Jima, and the Yalta and Potsdam conferences.

Seminal Primary Documents to Read: President Franklin Roosevelt, “Four Freedoms,” speech (1941)
Seminal Primary Documents to Consider: Justice Robert M. Jackson’s opinion for the Supreme Court in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) and Learned Hand’s The Spirit of Liberty (1944).

16 - Explain the reasons for the dropping of atom bombs on Japan and their short and long-term effects.

17 - Explain important domestic events that took place during the war. 

A.  how war-inspired economic growth ended the Great Depression.
B.  Philip Randolph and the efforts to eliminate employment discrimination
C.  the entry of large numbers of women into the workforce

D.  the internment of West Coast Japanese-Americans in the U.S. and Canada  (PAGE 76)


Thursday, June 25, 2015

AV#76-Colorado scores an F on our history standards – and what we can do about it (without spending a dime)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      March 5, 2011

“World War II was the mightiest struggle humankind has ever seen. It killed more people, cost more money, damaged more property, affected more people, and caused more far-reaching changes in nearly every country than any other war in history. The number of people killed, wounded, or missing between September 1939 and September 1945 can never be calculated, but it is estimated that more than 55 million people perished.”    
                                                                                   http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1661.html

Do you find it odd that World War II is not mentioned in the Colorado history standards?  Not once in 100 pages.  At one point, they get close … but then skip over those six horrific years:
“Prepared graduates” will “investigate causes and effects of significant events in United States history.  Topics to include but not limited to WWI, Great Depression, Cold War…”
Something missing?  Go to our standards and do a search for World War II.  Search for Roosevelt, Churchill, Hitler.  Try Pearl Harbor, D-Day, Hiroshima, A-Bomb. Nothing. Zip.

**
To get an F in college—an Art History course--was embarrassing.  Maybe I shouldn’t have slept through the final exam.  No one likes to get an F, but we should take it to heart and see how we can improve.  That’s certainly what we will be saying to schools if Colorado starts giving them letter grades—as many states are doing.  That is certainly what we would ask of a teacher—or a student—given such a low evaluation.  Unless we want to shoot the messenger, failing grades should force a little soul-searching.

This past month the Thomas B. Fordham Institute released its first report on the quality of state history standards since 2003.  Eight years ago our standards were given a D.  Colorado’s grade today?  F.  Our scores on Content and Rigor – 0/7.  On Clarity and Specificity: 0/3. 
(The State of State U.S. History Standards 2011, by Sheldon M. Stern, Jeremy A. Stern)

Table-1 • 2011 Grades for U.S. History Standards - Ranked from Best to Worst

STATE
2011 GRADE
South Carolina
A
Alabama
A-
California
A-
Indians
A-
Massachusetts
A-
New York
A-
Oklahoma
B+
Georgia
B
Michigan
B
12 states
C
10 states
D
18 states, including COLORADO
F

So I ask: What are we doing about it?  Can’t we do better?

As Table 1 shows, we were hardly alone with our low score.  Fordham’s “Key findings include:
A majority of states’ standards are mediocre-to-awful. The average grade across all states is barely a D. In twenty-eight jurisdictions—a majority of states—the history standards earn Ds or below. Eighteen earn Fs.  Just one state—South Carolina—has standards strong enough to earn a straight A. … just ten states—or about one in five—get honors marks.  (These states provide) …several national models … that lagging states could and should emulate going forward.
               
We learned of the report in The Washington Post, Education Week, and The Economist, but not a word in The Denver Post or Education News Colorado.  It deserves our attention.  I have supported the standards effort since it began in the early 1990’s.  The F does embarrass me, as I suspect it does many Coloradans who believe the standards we commit to reveals our expectations for public schools.  Furthermore, I taught some history when, in my English classes, students read speeches by Churchill and Roosevelt, W.E.B. Du Bois, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X (again, not one of whom is named in Colorado’s history standards)

What’s wrong with our standards?

First, The Economist’s summary.  It points out that while President Obama and many others remind us how critical it is that we improve the teaching of math, science, and technology, a 2009 test found an even smaller percentage of high school seniors—47%—scored at the basic level in history than in math.  “One problem, (this) new report argues, is that states have pathetic standards for what history should be taught. Good standards do not ensure that students will learn history. But they are a crucial guide…many states emphasize abstract concepts rather than history itself.”

That captures the essence of Fordham’s two-page criticism of our standards (found at http://www.edexcellencemedia.net/publications/2011/20110216_SOSHS/SOSS_USHistory_Colorado.pdf).

A few bullets from the report (quoted with permission from Fordham):

Overview  -  The 2009 Colorado social studies standards, we are told, were “designed for clarity, rigor, and coherence,” aiming for “fewer, higher and clearer standards.” The result is meant to be “a vision” of “what all students should know and be able to do at each grade level through eighth, and then through high school.” Unfortunately, thematic abstractions dominate the standards—to the near-total exclusion of historical or chronological coherence, obscuring what limited content there is in a confused tangle of categories, subcategories, and jargon.

Goals and Organization  -  Each such expectation consists of a thematic heading—labeled “concepts and skills students master”—laying out broad conceptual themes to be covered. For example, one eighth-grade history grade-level expectation directs students to “formulate appropriate hypotheses about United States history based on a variety of historical sources and perspectives.

The state then provides a series of “evidence outcomes” for each concepts and skills heading. These are thematic summary statements of knowledge that students must master as well as “21st century skills and readiness competencies.” …This jargon-laden snarl of nested categories severely fragments any historical content, making chronological presentation impossible. With content summaries so broad, general, and disorganized, even the basic scope of each year’s course can be difficult to discern.

Evaluation  -  According to the state’s social studies standards, Colorado students are expected to graduate with the skills to understand “how people view, construct and interpret history” and grasp “key historical periods and patterns of change over time within and across nations and cultures.”  Unfortunately, concepts and skills must be matched with content and substance if genuine historical clarity and rigor are to be achieved. Yet Colorado seems much more interested in abstract goals than specific substance….

Content and Rigor Conclusion  -  Colorado’s K–12 Academic Standards in social studies provide virtually no subject-specific content in U.S. history. There is hardly anything in U.S. history that teachers are specifically required to know or to teach at any particular grade level. A complete lack of specific content means that substantive rigor cannot be identified, measured, or evaluated. Even a few vague and brief references to specific eras or concepts cannot raise the score above a zero out of seven for Content and Rigor.

From Education Week – UNC professor responds

As Education Week’s article suggested, some will fault the messenger and dismiss the message:

But officials in some of those low-scoring states and other critics of the Fordham study said the poor ratings owe largely to differences between the institute and various states on how American history is best taught, what it should cover, and how detailed the curricula should be in elementary, middle, and high school.

“The authors seem to want a prescribed and detailed U.S. history curriculum for every state, and this is constitutionally impossible in Colorado,” said Fritz Fischer, a professor of history at the University of Northern Colorado and the chairman of the National Council for History Education. Under the state’s constitution, Colorado officials are prohibited from dictating curricula to school districts, he said. “The biggest problem reflected in the study is that it ignores historical thinking and understanding in favor of weakly defined ‘specific substance,’ ” said Mr. Fischer, who has also advised Colorado on developing social studies standards. “The authors appear to be attracted to lists of names, dates, and events at the expense of standards that require students to develop an in-depth understanding of historical concepts and ideas.”

However, Fordham’s president said its analysis is about making sure students have a firm grasp of historical facts before developing historical concepts and ideas.  “You have to get the bricks before you can get the mortar,” Chester E. Finn, Jr. said. 
(“Report Gives a Majority of States Poor Grades on History Standards,
by Michelle D. Anderson, Education Week, Feb. 16, 2011, online)

Jo O’Brien, Assistant Commissioner for Standards and Assessment at the Colorado Department of Education, emailed me: “It is not surprising that the Fordham reviewers rated Colorado’s history standards as they did given their review criteria is fundamentally different than the framework used to develop all of Colorado’s Academic Standards.  States rated high by Fordham tend to have history standards and addendum documents that are more curricular in nature.  In Colorado, curriculum design occurs at the district level, not at the state level.”  She added: “The need for specific and rigorous curriculum is essential. Colorado is not in a legal position to offer curriculum.  That will always put us crossways with such a review.”

A recommendation for elementary and middle schools

Perhaps the state cannot do more.  I would note, though, that we recently adopted the Common Core standards in English, and here we at least see a list of texts—specific novels, stories, poems, and  speeches--that would help schools and teachers know what literature would meet expectations at certain grade levels*.  I am sure many teachers across the state pay less attention to the amorphous state standards and feel their more specific district standards are a better guide. (This English teacher felt that way about the Douglas County language arts standards, as compared to the state standards). 

Still, I believe many schools and teachers would be glad to have a list of essential names, places, events, and critical ideas to address (which is hardly “dictating curricula,” true?)  It is challenging enough to prepare the best units and lesson plans; I certainly wanted some choices as a teacher, but I was sure there were folks brighter than me who could come up with the big picture, the essentials of what to teach.

For K-8 history and geography, I think it has been done.  The Core Knowledge Sequence— now guiding the teaching of history in close to 100 Colorado public and private schools—offers the specificity that gives teachers everything our state standards do not.  I speak as one who spent most of the past decade teaching English in three schools committed to, or moving towards, Core Knowledge as its guide.  Language arts teachers benefit greatly knowing what our students are being taught by our colleagues who teach history.  The curriculum outline is written in a way that we often piggyback on each other’s work.

Let’s take, say, World War II.  Pages 5 and 6 here give you Core’s guide for that unit in history.  Those who see it as “merely a list to memorize” that demands insufficient “critical thinking skills” show little appreciation for the powerful units created by my history colleagues Mark, Diana, and Miles, or for the heartfelt discussions as our students wrestled with these events.

Language Arts Class: World War II–speeches by Churchill (1940) and Roosevelt (1941), and The Diary of a Young Girl (1942-1944), by Anne Frank

Colorado standards and the Core curriculum expect students to read essays and speeches as well as fiction.  I was glad to use time in English class when students could read Winston Churchill’s “Blood Sweat and Tears” and “Their Finest Hour”; I did so as my Social Studies colleague hit 1940.   As history class entered 1941 and America’s involvement, my class read Franklin Roosevelt’s “The Four Freedoms” and “Declaration of War Against Japan.”  Our close look at these texts gave the students new insight into how these two men spoke for—and led— their nations.  (NOTE: Two of those speeches are referenced in the Common Core English standards.*)

Then we began The Diary of a Young Girl.  (Note—this is recommended for seventh graders in the Common Core Curriculum Map, designed to align with the Common Core standards—see http://commoncore.org/maps/index.php/maps/grade_7_unit_3/#But if history class isn’t simultaneously teaching WWII, how will students have the needed context to appreciate Anne Frank’s situation?)  Her story moves from the summer of 1942 to the bombings of Amsterdam to D-Day and into August 1944—with the Frank family, like millions, waiting for the Allies to arrive.  Their fears—and their desperate hope for liberation from Nazi rule—came to life in the words of thoughtful teenager growing up, struggling with relationships, with the war and prejudice, and hoping to discover who she is.

From the Core Knowledge Sequence- curriculum guide for 7th Grade History/Geography*

NOTE: This is one page from the four-plus pages in the CK 7th grade curriculum guide – see page 180-185 of the Core Knowledge Sequence – Content and Skills Guidelines for K-8:

V. World War II

A. THE RISE OF TOTALITARIANISM IN EUROPE
• Italy
Mussolini establishes fascism
Attack on Ethiopia
• Germany
Weimar Republic, economic repercussions of WWI
Adolf Hitler and the rise of Nazi totalitarianism: cult of the Führer (“leader”),  Mein Kampf
Nazism and the ideology of fascism, in contrast to communism and democracy
Racial doctrines of the Nazis: anti-Semitism, the concept of Lebensraum (literally, “living space”) for the “master race,” Kristallnacht
The Third Reich before the War: Gestapo, mass propaganda, book burning
• The Soviet Union
Communist totalitarianism: Josef Stalin, “Socialism in one country”
Collectivization of agriculture
Five-year plans for industrialization
The Great Purge
• Spanish Civil War  -- Franco, International Brigade, Guernica

B. WORLD WAR II IN EUROPE AND AT HOME, 1939–45
• Hitler defies Versailles Treaty: reoccupation of Rhineland, Anschluss, annexation of Austria
• Appeasement: Munich Agreement, “peace in our time”
• Soviet-Nazi Nonaggression Pact
• Blitzkrieg: invasion of Poland, fall of France, Dunkirk
• Battle of Britain: Winston Churchill, “nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat”
• The Home Front in America
American Lend-Lease supplies, Atlantic Charter
America First movement
U.S. mobilization for war: desegregation of defense industries, “Rosie the Riveter,” war bonds
America races Germany to develop the atomic bomb: the Manhattan Project
• Hitler invades Soviet Union: battles of Leningrad and Stalingrad
• The Holocaust: “Final Solution,” concentration camps (Dachau, Auschwitz)
• North Africa Campaign: El Alamein
• D-Day: Allied invasion of Normandy, General Dwight Eisenhower
• Battle of the Bulge, bombing of Dresden
• Yalta Conference
• Surrender of Germany, Soviet Army takes Berlin

*Reprinted with permission from the Core Knowledge Foundation, from The Core Knowledge Sequence: Content and Skill Guidelines for Grades PreK - 8, © 2010 by the Core Knowledge Foundation. (Note: updated in 2010.)  Not to be copied or reproduced without permission from the Core Knowledge Foundation, 801 E. High Street, Charlottesville, VA  22902   www.coreknowledge.org <http://www.coreknowledge.org/.

C. WORLD WAR II IN THE PACIFIC, AND THE END OF THE WAR
• Historical background: Japan’s rise to power
Geography of Japan (review all topics from grade 5) -- Sea of Japan and Korea Strait
   High population density, very limited farmland, heavy reliance on imported raw materials, food
Japanese imperialism: occupation of Korea, invasion of Manchuria, Rape of Nanking
Japanese-Soviet neutrality treaty
• Pearl Harbor, Dec. 7, 1941: “A day that will live in infamy.”
• Internment of Japanese-Americans
• Fall of the Philippines: Bataan Death March, General Douglas MacArthur, “I shall return.”
• Surrender of Japan -- Atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Enola Gay
U.S. dictates pacifist constitution for Japan, Emperor Hirohito
• Potsdam Conference, Nuremberg war crimes trials
• Creation of United Nations: Security Council, Universal Declaration of Human Rights

**
I use the World War II material merely as one example to contrast Colorado’s standards with Core Knowledge.  Similar specific content enables 8th grade English and history teachers to collaborate as they read: The Good Earth while studying China; Animal Farm after studying the Russian Revolution and totalitarianism; and Du Bois, Hurston, Angelou, King, and Malcolm X during their study of the Civil Rights movement. (King’s “Letter from Birmingham City Jail” is also referenced in the Common Core standards for grades 9-10.)

An F seems right when our standards fail to mention what is perhaps the most critical event of the 20th century.  An outcome that was no sure thing.  So much blood shed.  Huge stakes.  Never again, we tell ourselves.  But hard to learn from this cataclysm—if we fail to teach it.  

What should guide us?  Those who developed our history standards speak of the Massachusetts Curriculum Framework as one resource.  There you will find clear expectations on teaching WW II—see pages 60 and 76— http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/hss/final.pdf.  This part didn’t make it west.  Closer to home, we have 100 schools that find the Core Knowledge Sequence a good place to start.  Perhaps more K-8 teachers will follow.  The bound copy is $35, but at  www.coreknowledge.org/downloads it is free.  I hope you’ll take a look.