Dec. 3, 2013
Colorado’s writing standards and high school
expectations frown on students finding their voice
You might say I write like a teenager because I use the first person
and can’t get away from writing about myself even when the topic doesn’t call
for such egocentric intrusions. You may be right.
Does voice matter in good writing?
Literacy.W.9-10.1d
- “Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending
to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.”
--From the
Common Core State Standards, which—in the pages on Writing for grades 7-12 on
Writing—do not mention VOICE. Not once.
|
But my experience as a writer,
and as a writing teacher, says voice matters, and that we do a disservice to
our middle and high school students if we discourage them from using their
voice, to speak of their lives, and to address these issues—when appropriate—in
the first person. And yet the writing assignments
we give our students often fail to do this.
The trend—from what I have seen as a tutor the past three years, and now
gathering steam with Colorado’s new writing standards (see box on the right; more
detail in the Addendum)—is to ignore
the personal essay. A trend almost as
alarming as the steady decline in the percentage of students Colorado
proficient in writing as they move through our schools.
YES,
HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM: % PROFICIENT IN WRITING HITS LOW MARK IN 10th
GRADE
In 7th grade, roughly 60% of Colorado’s
students are proficient in writing, but by the time they reach
10th grade – two years before they would
like to be college-ready – that percentage falls below 50%
4-5 year trend - % proficient and advanced (P/A)
TCAP - WRITING
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
Decline for this class in % P/A over last few years
|
Overall score –
proficient and advanced
|
6th
grade
61%
|
7th
grade
58%
|
8th
grade
54%
|
9th grade
51%
|
10th grade
49%
|
-12%
|
7th
grade
62%
|
8th
grade
55%
|
9th
grade
53%
|
10th grade
48%
|
|
-14%
|
Writing teachers must ask why this is so. I suspect it is partly because we do little
to help students find their voice as writers.
Moreover, we confuse them. Juniors
and seniors work on their personal statement for their college application, even
as their AP Language and Composition course insists they write in the third person
and bring “a detached point of view.” Another
irony: We know it is critical to build strong relationships to keep our
students in school and engaged, but the
English teacher—rather than inviting teenagers to share their lives through journal
writing, personal essays, and reflections on the readings—steers clear of such
assignments.
I realize we should teach students
how to express opinions without using the first person. I applaud the strong
features in the new standards: of course, let’s be sure student writing is
“grounded in evidence from the text.” And
I am not suggesting we return to the day when we thought the best way to reach
self-absorbed high school students was to meet them on those terms—as William
Zinsser[1]
puts it, “the let-it-all-hang-out version of the 60’s,” let them spill their
guts about every complaint known to The American Teenager. It’s almost comical how confident we were that
THIS was how we’d help students enjoy
the writing process, evnifthayculdntspellforbeens, and even, if, their,
punctuation, was, appalling.
But there is something sterile in all the recent assignments I see for
10th and 11th graders.
·
The generic: Analyze character, conflict, and
theme in Catcher in the Rye.
·
The esoteric: In Virginia Woolf’s essay, “Death
of a Moth,” identify five rhetorical devices she used and explain how they
helped her achieve her purpose.
·
And, now a common task I see from more than one
high school of late (derived from Aristotle’s Rhetoric): Examine the appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos in this
persuasive essay.
What about asking for a response that demands some self-reflection and
a personal connection to the reading? What
about questions that address our 15- and 16-year-olds on a more basic level?
Three
cheers to Bradford Intermediate in Jeffco
Don’t miss last week’s great story by Jenny Brundin
on the writing by sixth grades, students encouraged to write honestly about
success—and failure.
|
·
Do you or do you not identify with Holden’s
struggles? Explain why or why not.
·
“Life is fragile.” Woolf is saying something on
this idea. Does her perspective ring true
for you? Why or why not?
·
Provide three reasons why you do or do not
disagree with this persuasive essay calling for (as one example) greater gun
control measures.
The
course syllabus – again, virtually silent on voice
Read the course syllabus for English classes for 10th and 11th
graders. I am NOT making this up; it is
available on the web site from the English Department at a local high school. Hardly a word asking students to find their
voice, to write about themselves. It all
sounds so academic—in the driest sense of the word—just when, as a college
advisor notes, “these teenagers are a bundle of emotions.”
·
10th
grade English - The focus sophomore year is “POWER, SOCIETY, & THE
INDIVIDUAL.”
“Students will
compare and contrast perspectives developed in multiple informational and persuasive
texts/forms of media by citing strong textual evidence to draw conclusions
about the role of power in society.”
(COMMENT:
It is discouraging to see language like this, from English teachers. But
there’s more like it….)
A parable
The need to find the words about a meaningful event
or someone important,
even if “they” (teachers, parents, adults) aren’t
listening.
from J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye
Chapter
2 - When “‘old Spencer” lectures Holden on his failures (“I flunked you in
history because you knew absolutely nothing.”), our hero tries to respond,
but comments on his teacher:
“He wasn’t even listening. He hardly ever listened
to you when you said something.”
Chapters
4 & 5 – Holden—even as he prepares to flunk out of his fourth school—can
write. His roommate asks Holden to draft
a composition for him.
“What on?” Holden asks.
“Anything. Anything descriptive. A room. Or a house.
Or something you once lived in or something – you know. Just as long as it’s descriptive as hell.”
Holden
sits down to work on the essay.
“I’m not
too crazy about describing rooms and houses anyway. So what I did, I wrote
about my brother Allie’s baseball mitt. It was a very descriptive subject. It
really was…. He’s dead now. He got leukemia and died when we were up in
Maine, on July 18, 1946. You’d have liked him…. God, he was a nice kid,
though. He used to laugh so hard at something he thought of at the dinner
table that he just about fell off his chair. I was only thirteen, and they
were going to have me psychoanalyzed and all, because I broke all the windows
in the garage. I don’t blame them. I really don’t…. It was a very stupid
thing to do, I’ll admit, but I hardly didn’t even know I was doing it, and
you didn’t know Allie….”
|
“Students will use comparative language to synthesize how different
texts examine power to reflect on the authors’ differing perspectives.”
Welcome the young person—not just the student
“The children who came into my classrooms
were also perceptive—they caught on quickly whether school was going to be a
place where they should bring their whole selves, or leave most of themselves
at the schoolhouse door.” Deborah
Meier, Nov. 21, 2013, http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/Bridging-Differences.
|
“Students will recognize literary components and analyze the author’s
use of these components in creating a message about the human
condition.”
· 11th
grade English -
“Students will develop and/or refine their academic writing styles
(i.e. formal writing) to analyze and respond to text.”
“Students will learn, develop, and utilize critical literacy skills to
answer the following questions:
How do readers use critical reading strategies to analyze and evaluate
text, and how does a writer use formal register to create an academic persona?”
The AP Language course, as several
juniors we tutor have discovered, is especially strict about eliminating the “I”
in their essays. A student hears this message: In order to teach you how to
write a college essay, we have to unteach all you’ve learned about expressing
your feelings in the first person….
AP Language
and Composition – On completing the class successfully, the AP student
will:
“Make stylistic
choices about diction, syntax, figurative language etc with an awareness of
purpose and audience for writing. Use local and global revision to make changes
in text for reasons of clarity or style.”
“… take inventory of what he or she knows about a topic to guide
research and achieve intended effect for purpose and audience.”
Common
Core State Standards AND (not versus) Six Traits + 1
A recent look at the
implementation of CCSS in seven states, including Colorado, paints a hopeful
view of the transformation under way (http://hechingerreport.org/content/six-ways-common-core-changes-english-and-math-classrooms_13330/ Oct. 15, 2013). One section of the report lists several “Ways
Common Core changes English and math classrooms,” including:
Before
|
Common
Core
|
Students
asked about personal reactions and experiences in response to literature
|
Students must base
arguments and essays on evidence from
the reading, not their own opinions or experiences
|
This change is presented as good news, a step forward. My question: must it be either/or?
Like many
teachers in Colorado and across the country, I found the Six Traits +1 Writing Model
of Instruction & Assessment (designed
by Education Northwest) an excellent guide to teach student
writing. It helps a school, grade by
grade, focus on six key traits: ideas
and content, organization, voice, sentence fluency, word choice, and conventions. New teachers will be
especially grateful for the Six Traits’
material, such as succinct descriptions of what to look for in evaluating
student work. For voice:
·
Sounds like a person wrote it; sounds like this
writer – (no one else sounds like this!)
·
Makes you feel
something
·
Punch, flair, style, courage (I’m not afraid to
say what I really think)
Education Northwest has written a “Crosswalk Between 6+1 Traits and
CCSS Writing and Language Standards” (http://educationnorthwest.org/webfm_send/1252), no doubt to
reassure districts and schools that Six Traits still “fits in” with Common Core
guidelines. It looks like a stretch to
me. This teacher would fight to see that
my English Department did not put compliance with the new standards ahead of
what we know to be true—and what our students should know: strong voice is essential to good writing.
Teaching
the essay – examples show it can, at times must,
be first person to achieve its purpose
Give our students great examples of
first-person work –
then let do try their hand at it too
MLK Jr. - “Letter from Birmingham City Jail” and “I
Have a Dream”
E.B. White - “Death of a Pig”
Rachel Carson - “The Marginal World”
John McPhee - “Under the Snow”
Malcolm X – “On African Self-Hatred”
Maya Angelou – selection from I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
Zora Neale Hurston – selections from Dust Tracks on the Road
Richard Rodriguez – selection from Hunger of Memory
|
A young writer learns from the best writers. I loved teaching exceptional works like those
listed here (see box) in a Parker charter school, and I often created writing
tasks using such works as models for my 8th grade students. These
essays (non-fiction), speeches, and selections from autobiographies come from the
Core Knowledge guidelines. All employ the first-person “I”—suggesting we
might do well to let students do the same. (NOTE: The Common Core reading
standards ask teachers to assign exactly this kind of literary nonfiction, “texts that provide appropriately complex language.”
See http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/standard-10-range-quality-complexity/texts-illustrating-the-complexity-quality-range-of-student-reading-6-12.)
The most helpful writing teacher I had was Mr. Lambert, junior
year. We read many novels in his class,
but we also read most of Essays Old and
New, a collection including works from Bacon, Swift, Emerson, and nearly 40
others.[2] Many classic essays that endure in part because
we hear an individual speaking to us.
I open that book now and discover one
writer after another addressing us in the first-person singular—and on occasion
in the first-person plural. (When a third-person voice is used, as in William
Allen White’s tribute to his dead daughter, it is all the more poignant for
this choice.)
Oh, but you say, these writers—like Ben Franklin, Mark Twain, Theodore
Roosevelt, and Helen Keller—were important people. They had something worth saying to the world,
which is not true of your average 16-year-old. To which I reply:
1) Nothing worth
saying? See my recent piece about 16-year-old Malala Yousafzai, whose voice is now
heard around the world (http://www.ednewscolorado.org/voices/voices-motivating-words-from-malala-for-her-fellow-16-year-old-girls). See Anne Frank’s diary, written from age 13
to 15, which still speaks so powerfully to us, 70 years later. See your daughter’s essay (Eliza’s mom, I
remember!) about what her grandmother meant to her….
2) Did our great essayists learn to write with such sincerity, wit, and
insight by always writing in the third person?
It takes practice. Can’t we
practice in middle and high school? Must
we ask 15-year-olds to assume a scholarly stance when we know they will “speak”—in
their own voice, with far greater
energy and care—if the topic touches their lives?
Common Core’s mission statement assures us that “the standards are
designed to be robust and relevant to the real world.” Sounds good.
But a tenth grader looks at the assignment and asks: what about me? Isn’t
my world “the real world”? Aren’t my
experiences and feelings relevant?
I
wonder how many students, like a Holden Caulfield, have something well worth
saying—the chance to say it might even make English class matter!—but our assignments tell them:
sorry, we aren’t listening. What if we were the teacher given a composition
such as the one Holden wrote about his dead brother?
“My brother Allie had this left-handed fielder’s mitt. He was
left-handed. The thing that was descriptive about it, though, was that it had
poems written all over the fingers and the pocket and everywhere. In green ink.
He wrote them on it so that he’d have something to read when he was in the
field and nobody was up at bat.”
I hope we would say: “Holden,
this is great! Thank you!”
Addendum – If VOICE matters, you wouldn’t
know it by the standards
I understand that the Colorado
Academic Standards are not to be equated
with but are informed by the
Common Core State Standards. Still, you
can see how much the latter has influenced the former when you search the
Common Core English Language Arts Standards for Writing, Grades 6-12, to see if
VOICE is mentioned. No, not once. (http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/W/introduction)
Now search the Colorado Academic
Standards for Reading Writing, and
Communicating (http://www.cde.state.co.us/CoReadingWriting/),
grades 9-12. VOICE is barely mentioned:
Standard 3 – Writing and Composition –
Includes grade level expectations for each grade
12th grade – Voice appears twice (bold mine)
Concepts and skills
students master:
1. Style, detail,
expressive language, and genre create a well-crafted statement directed at an
intended audience and purpose
Students Can: Critique own writing and the writing of
others from the perspective of the intended audience to guide revisions,
improve voice and style (word
choice, sentence variety, figurative language) and achieve intended purpose and
effect
In the column on the
right, on “21st Century Skills and Readiness Competencies,” we read:
Writers can
persuade readers and voice opinions
through various forms of writing (such as an editorial for the school or local
news source).
11th grade – Voice does not appear
10th grade – Voice appears three times
Concepts and skills
students master:
3. Grammar, language
usage, mechanics, and clarity are the basis of ongoing refinements and
revisions within the writing process
Students can: Distinguish
between the active and passive voice,
and write in the active voice
Over to the right,
in the column called “21st Century Skills and Readiness Competencies,” we see
four Inquiry Questions for students. One
is:
How
does voice make writing more
interesting?
(COMMENT: I find the other three equally bland—or inane.)
1. What
would writing look like if there were no punctuation?
2. Why
would it be difficult to read texts that do not have correct punctuation?
3. Why
is correct grammar important to the reader? )
9th grade - Voice appears once
Concepts and skills
students master:
1. Literary and
narrative texts develop a controlling idea or theme with descriptive and
expressive language
Students can: Refine the expression of voice and tone in a text by selecting and using appropriate
vocabulary, sentence structure, and sentence organization
[1]Zinsser’s On
Writing Well, a modern classic, would
tell our English Departments: welcome
each student’s voice. Two examples: 1) “No teacher wants twenty-five copies
of the same person, writing about the same topic. What we’re all looking
for—what we want to see pop out of your papers—is individuality. We’re looking
for whatever it is that makes you unique. Write about what you know and what
you think.” 2) “If you’re a writing
teacher, make your students believe in the validity of their lives.”
[2] E.B. White’s Elements
of Style was another text we studied with Mr. Lambert. As a master of the personal essay, E.B. White
gets the final word here on the importance of voice. See chapter 5: “Every
writer, by the way he uses the language, reveals something of his spirit, his
habits, his capacities, his bias. This
is inevitable as well as enjoyable. All
writing is communication; creative writing is communication through
revelation—it is the Self escaping into the open. No writer long remains
incognito.”
No comments:
Post a Comment