Tuesday, February 9, 2021

AV #225 - “Recreate Montbello” – Nostalgia? Amnesia? A few reminders

A “new” Montbello – the danger of nostalgia


I respect the desire to try something “new” for Montbello High, but I hope it is not driven by nostalgia for what was, or by amnesia regarding what caused its closure ten years ago.

 

“… historical nostalgia is often colored by personal nostalgia. When were the good old days? Was it, by chance, the incredible short period in human history when you happened to be young?” “Why We Can’t Stop Longing for the Good Old Days” [i]

AV #225 will remind us of the quality of education at Montbello High that brought about its closure. I also present articles about the Montbello story from the last three years that led up to the decision in 2020 to “recreate Montbello,” to become, again, a comprehensive high school.

 My comments—set alongside these stories—are meant to say: it is not too late to reassess this effort. Why the rush? Why hire a principal before there is any agreement on the school’s mission, if it even has one beyond being big? $130 million committed by voters, without any clarity on the kind of school to build. We read plenty of platitudes about opportunity and making your dreams come true. Hardly a word about offering the students in the Montbello, at long last, a “high-quality” school.

A simple question: Is the goal to recreate a comprehensive high school, or to create an exceptionally good school? Can you do both? Any examples? No one can want to recreate a school that, lest we forget, was doing such a poor job by its students. 

I believe Denver Public Schools and its board mean well in addressing the needs of the Montbello community—and in a similar story at West High.[ii] I also appreciate what an incredibly challenging time this is for all in public education, especially in a large urban district. In that light, some will say, if Another View cannot be supportive of DPS in this difficult moment, wouldn’t it be best to be silent? 

In AV #224 I argued that we should put the design for the new school in the hands of people willing to search for and adopt the best ideas out there. Denver Public Schools has strengths, but creating a high-quality secondary school is clearly not one of them. Let DPS get its own high schools in order first.  

Not convinced? OK, but please, hit pause. Reflect. Ask tough questions. We cannot fail Montbello again.

 “Give Montbello its due”

In my research for AV #224 I found an old Rocky Mountain News article where “Bettina Basamow, a 29-year resident of the far northeast Denver community” told the school board, “You need to be sure you give Montbello its due.” Dated: November 2000.

Yes, the wait has been too long. But let’s make sure we do this right. Think. Plan. Be clear.

 

Articles on a new school at Montbello High: 2018-2020

Addendum A – Montbello High, 2006-2014. Academic performance, dropout & remediation rates, SPF, etc.

Addendum B – “High-quality schools” – still the goal?

Addendum C – Apply DPS process for New Quality Schools

Addendum D – 6 DPS high schools performing well. Lessons?


 


                                                                                                                                                                






**

A compilation of recent articles (2018-2020) and DPS presentations on a new school/schools in the Montbello community. My comments and questions (in boxes) show why I am greatly troubled by where this work is going.

 

1)     April 2, 2018

         In far northeast Denver, there’s a heated debate over the desire for a traditional high school

                                                              Chalkbeat Colorado, by Melanie Asmar                         

                                                                                                                           (Bold mine)

“To resurrect.” Surely not that. Or have we forgotten why Montbello High School was closed?

See Addendum A for a review of MHS, 2006-2014.

   A community conversation in far northeast Denver started as an effort to ask residents what they want in their schools. It has boiled over into a heated debate about whether to resurrect the region’s shuttered traditional high school.                                      

   The aim of a series of community meetings run by Denver Public Schools over the past year was to come to consensus on education priorities, a district spokeswoman said. Those priorities, she said, would “inform future district policy-making.”

   But when word got out that some residents were asking for the return of a traditional high school, the backlash was fierce. Principals, teachers, parents, and students from some of the small schools that have grown in the absence of a big high school lined up at a recent school board meeting to give passionate testimony about what they consider a flawed process and a dangerous recommendation that could threaten their schools’ existence.

__

   In 2010, the Denver school board approved a massive turnaround plan involving six schools in the far northeast. The plan called for Montbello High – where fewer than 60 percent of students were graduating, and almost all who went on to college needed to take remedial classes – to be phased out and replaced with three smaller schools.

The plea in 2010 was for “great schools in Far Northeast Denver.” Did any of the new schools inside Montbello High prove to be great schools? Is the demand again for “great schools,” or for something else? Something big? That looks like other high schools - great or not?  

   On the night of the vote, students, parents, and teachers pleaded with the school board to give Montbello High another chance. The board also heard from supporters of the plan, who wore graduation caps and T-shirts that said: “We Demand Great Schools in Far Northeast Denver.” In the end, a majority of the seven board members sided with Superintendent Tom Boasberg and a community committee that recommended the sweeping changes.

   Today, there are 11 high schools in far northeast Denver. They include the three schools that replaced Montbello, five other district-run schools, and three charter schools, which are publicly funded but independently run. Most have fewer than 500 students.

--

   The topic of athletics hit a nerve in Montbello, a neighborhood with a proud history of excelling at high school sports, especially football. More than 60 people showed up to a November meeting on the subject.

   They included Brandon Pryor, [and] his wife Samantha, an attorney who graduated from Montbello. [Pryor is] a football coach for the Far Northeast Warriors, a team created after the closure of Montbello High that draws players from several high schools in the region. “Black and brown communities have been ignored as a whole and targeted for these Frankenstein experiments, like co-location,” he said.

   Samantha Pryor came up with a way to visualize that feeling: Before giving public comment at a recent school board meeting, she printed up T-shirts that said, “20%,” a reference to the district’s goal that 80 percent of all students will attend high-quality schools by 2020. “We really believe we are the 20 percent,” she said in an interview.

   Notes from commission meetings in November, December, and January obtained in an open records request show many participants shared the Pryors’ concerns. In January, the commission generated lists of draft priorities to be discussed at the now-canceled March meeting.

   The priorities included recruiting more teachers of color, increasing funding for school counselors and social workers, and installing lights on the Montbello playing fields.

   Also on the list: Have a comprehensive high school option in the far northeast.

__

   Several high school athletes gave public comment as well, including one who said he lost scholarships to play football at several Division I colleges because he didn’t meet the academic credit requirements. His small high school, he said, didn’t offer enough courses.

   Others spoke about how their schools don’t have access to a library or computer lab, and how different bell schedules make it hard for players to get to practice at the same time.

   Opening a traditional high school would remedy those issues, said Khaaliq Stevenson, a student athlete at Collegiate Prep Academy, one of the three schools that replaced Montbello High.  https://denverite.com/2018/04/02/montbello-high-school-northeast-denver/

 

2)     July 31, 2019

Denver proposes rebuilding a campus that was the site of a controversial school closure

Chalkbeat Colorado, by Melanie Asmar   


That was then. Now, isn’t this exactly what DPS plans to do?

Denver school officials are exploring building a new high school in the Montbello neighborhood, but it won’t be the comprehensive high school some community members want. Instead, it would be designed to house the five small schools that now share the campus.     

“This is not relaunching the comprehensive high school,” said Dustin Kress, a senior operations program manager for Denver Public Schools. “This is planning for a new facility for the programs currently on the Montbello campus.”

Even so, the school board member who represents the area said she hopes the new building would be flexible enough to accommodate evolving community desires.

The programs currently on the campus include two district-run programs that each have a middle and high school,

Noel Community Arts School and Denver Center for International Studies at Montbello are district-run schools that serve grades 6 through 12.

 

 

 

and one charter middle school that is publicly funded but independently run.

 

STRIVE Prep - Montbello is a charter middle school.

 

 

Together, the schools served about 1,630 students last year.


The district should know that higher graduation rates are not an indicator of schools offering a higher quality of education. This very sentence reveals the contradiction. Several of us have made this point for years.[iii]As AV #224 showed, the tragically high remediation rate for graduates of Montbello H.S. in its final years continued in the new smaller schools - close to 65%.

The Montbello campus has been shared since 2011, after the Denver school board voted to close the academically struggling Montbello High School, which served a student body that was largely black and Latino. The district replaced Montbello High with small schools it thought could do better. The decision was controversial, and it remains so today.            

While district officials point to rising graduation rates as proof the decision was a good one, the small schools have continued to struggle academically. Some parents and community members say the shared campus has created other academic and social inequities, as well.

Denver Public Schools Superintendent Susana Cordova said the new building would be a way to recognize the hard work of the educators at the small schools, while at the same time acknowledging that there is room for improvement.

Well said!

Still the promise from DPS?

“We have incredibly committed teachers and leaders working in the building right now,” she said. But, she added, “we’re nowhere close to realizing the promise we’ve made to the Montbello community about the quality of education on the Montbello campus.”

The building itself opened in 1980 and has an industrial look. …  Noel Community Arts School, an arts-focused school with nearly 500 students, has no practice rooms and just a single dance studio. The curtain on the stage in the auditorium, which theater classes must share with the other schools, is 40 years old and falling apart. Principal Rhonda Juett said that sends a negative message to students and families.

“That reality for kids and for parents, that hits home,” she said. “We want to have a facility that is equitable and that allows you to compete with anybody anywhere.”

Cordova said she’s not naive about the call for a comprehensive high school. “I hear the call, the desire for a comprehensive high school,” she said. “This gives us an opportunity to say, ‘How do we create a pathway forward that gets at the best of everything we can offer?’”


  Confused? In July 2019 the plan called for a new building that would host the three small schools, but might also offer the benefits of a large school. Clear?

  In September 2019, the Denver School Board’s resolution stated “that the design will … ensure that the facility will be able to accommodate the three schools currently located on the campus and be flexible to adapt to any changes in academic programming for decades to come.” Any clearer?

That pathway wouldn’t necessarily entail building a comprehensive high school alongside the small schools. Rather, she said she envisions coming up with a design that incorporates some of the benefits of a large high school into the new campus.

School board member Jennifer Bacon, who represents Montbello, supports rebuilding the campus. But she said she wants to ensure the design is flexible enough to accommodate a different configuration — including a return to a single comprehensive high school — if that’s what the community decides it wants down the road. 

“This, to me, is a catalyst,” Bacon said. “Even though we’re talking about the building, the questions can’t be avoided — and I don’t intend to do that.”

https://co.chalkbeat.org/2019/7/31/21108579/denver-proposes-rebuilding-a-campus-that-was-the-site-of-a-controversial-school-closure

   

3)        February 29, 2020 

Northeast Denver residents seek new high school options, but DPS says there’s no need

     Proposed expansion of DSST at Noel and new Montbello High both have supporters

The Denver Post, Meg Wingerter

    The district projects it won’t need any new schools through at least spring 2022, though, as the student population is expected to drop from about 94,000 in 2019 to about 91,000 in 2024. The far northeast is expected to be a mixed bag, with fewer students in the Montbello neighborhood …

Demand for a traditional high school

   School board Vice President Jennifer Bacon … said she thinks there is room for additional options, because substantial development is going on in the Green Valley Ranch neighborhood, but DPS will need to balance not building so much that other schools lose students. It’s important to match any new schools with what the community wants, and to consider what isn’t currently available — like a comprehensive high school, she said.

   “We’re not just thinking about the seats, we’re thinking about the quality of the seats,”* she said.


   From a Letter to the Editor from Gloria Zamora, then Board chair of DSST Public Schools (March 15).

“I read with interest the piece on Sunday and in particular school board vice president Jennifer Bacon’s statement [on the quality of the seats*]. I applaud Ms. Bacon’s statement and believe city leaders should take a more active role in helping Denver Public Schools achieve this result.”

As you read on, ask if “the quality” of the education offered by a new high school is central to the planning.

   Some students and community members say the 11 high schools serving the far northeast aren’t meeting their needs, though. Most of the high schools are relatively small and offer a specialized focus, like earning college credit, international studies or preventing students from dropping out. Some students have reported they take public transit every day to attend East High School, and DPS Superintendent Susana Cordova acknowledged earlier this month that demand for a comprehensive high school that offers more electives and extracurricular options has never gone away.


 
There are ongoing conversations about whether DPS can “reconfigure” use of the existing Montbello campus to accommodate a new school and the current programs, said Jennifer Holladay, who oversees the school district’s portfolio management.

 

4)     June 3, 2020

‘We’ve heard you:’ Denver pledges to reopen comprehensive high school in Montbello

Chalkbeat Colorado, by Melanie Asmar 

Ten years after the controversial closing of Denver’s Montbello High School, and two years after community members reignited the debate about whether to reopen it, new district leadership announced it is moving forward with opening a traditional high school in the neighborhood.  

A turning point, but why? Any concern about the quality of the education offered by the three schools at MHS? If not a factor, it says a lot about the new focus: we hear little now about a desire to create “a great school” or to provide a “high quality education.” More about electives, extracurricular options, sports… To be a “comprehensive” high school comes first.

In spite of an abundance of research and work on how, in urban school districts, this model has failed to serve students well. Let’s not forget The Shopping Mall High School and its powerful critique of schools with no clear mission, trying to please everyone – but ultimately not providing a high-quality education. (See AV#161[iv])

“We’ve heard you,” Denver Public Schools Superintendent Susana Cordova said at a meeting about the Montbello campus last week. “One of the most important things I think we can do is acknowledge and work in collaboration with the community that has so clearly stated they want to reopen a comprehensive high school on the Montbello campus.”  

The details about how and when the district will do that are still to be determined. The district must decide the size of the school and how many students it will serve, what academic programs and sports it will offer, whether to renovate the current campus or build a new school, and which current high schools, if any, will be closed to make way for a new one.

Cordova, a career Denver educator who became Superintendent last year, said she wants the process of reopening a comprehensive high school in Montbello to feel more empowering than the one to close it, which she called “one of the hardest processes that I ever watched.”

“How can we think about this being the union — the reunion — of school communities, as opposed to the closure” of school communities? Cordova said.

 “This fall”? More recently we have learned that the timeline for this “community-driven design process” will not conclude until spring of 2022. For over a year the plan was for a new building that would host the three small schools. This radical shift to open a comprehensive high school requires a new dialogue with parents and the community. It needs time.

 There are currently two high schools and three middle schools on the Montbello campus. For the 2020-21 school year, the five schools will continue to operate as usual, district officials said. Future changes will be decided as part of a “community-driven design process” slated to take place this fall, said district spokesperson Winna MacLaren.

Surveys conducted and commissioned by the district show support among community members and teachers for reopening a comprehensive high school.

1. What does a “community-driven design process” mean? Can you a name a great school designed this way? (Trying to please everyone? No clear mission?)   

2. Where is the expertise critical for such work? The district’s New Quality School Process has accumulated a deep understanding of effective new school designs. The Colorado Department of Education’s District and School Support team has also learned of effective school designs[v] and can point to a number of resources beyond our state that could help with this work.[vi]

3. DPS has overseen the schools operating there now, and yet not one is “meeting expectations” (AV #224). Will DPS acknowledge that it needs all the help it can get if we are to come up with the best design possible?

In a scientific poll of Montbello residents conducted by the Colorado survey firm Keating Research, 85% of 472 residents polled said they support the return of a comprehensive high school to the Montbello campus, according to a district presentation.            

Separately, the district collected survey responses from 105 teachers and staff members at the schools on the campus…. According to the district, 87% of the educators surveyed supported the return of a comprehensive high school “with some reservations.”

But some have questioned the validity of the survey results. “To just continuously poll the community about a comprehensive high school without specifically naming what will be and who will be the collateral damage of that, then it’s just gaslighting* to our community,” said Stacy Parrish, principal of Northeast Early College, another high school in far northeast Denver.   

The closing of Montbello High School was traumatic for many in the community. Though the school was struggling academically, it was a community hub with fiercely loyal alumni. Families and educators urged the district in 2010 to invest resources in the school, which served a largely black and Hispanic student population, rather than shut it down.

Instead, the school board voted to “phase out” Montbello High one grade at a time and replace it with smaller schools that board members believed would better serve students. But some of those schools continued to struggle with low test scores.

In 2018, when the district held a series of community meetings in Montbello to ask residents what they want in their schoolsthe idea of reopening a comprehensive high school came up. The district did not act on it, instead pledging to continue the conversation.

That happened in 2019, but not in the way the district intended. Spurred by the deteriorating physical shape of the 40-year-old Montbello campus, the district asked for community feedback on whether to renovate the campus or build a new one. The intention was for the new campus to continue to serve as a home for the small schools currently there.

But the idea of reopening a comprehensive high school resurfaced. In February, Cordova said the possibility was officially on the table. At last week’s meeting of a process the district is calling “Reimagining Montbello Campus,” Cordova said the district is pursuing it.  

  So we were told, then. (Was this the plan all along, to close these schools?) “We still believe in those values.” What values? In evidence with the new plan, to shut down these schools?

  “Both-and”? Sounds like all-of-the-above, with no clarity on what the new school is really about. So much is vague. Ill-defined.

  Again, I fear the community may have forgotten what clearly did not work before (Addendum A).

Educators and community members who attended the virtual meeting had lots of questions, including how opening a big, comprehensive high school would affect other small high schools in the far northeast Denver region…     

“This is not an effort to gobble up all of the schools into one, because we still believe in those values,” said school board Vice President Jennifer Bacon, who represents Montbello.

Rather, Cordova said, it’s an effort to give the community a school option they’ve been wanting. “We really believe this is a way to have a ‘both-and’ solution, not an ‘either-or’ solution,” she said.

https://co.chalkbeat.org/2020/6/3/21279899/denver-pledges-to-reopen-comprehensive-high-school-montbello

 

 

From Denver Public Schools – Reimagine Montbello Campus – Fall 2020 Update* 

DPS has explored different timelines for opening the new Montbello high school and feeder middle school, and have determined that we will launch the schools in fall 2022. This gives us time for an extensive school design process with the community, time to hire high-quality leaders and staff, and to allow time for facility planning.

We will begin the hiring process for two principals this winter, one for the comprehensive high school and one for the feeder middle school on the Montbello campus. We will involve the community in each of the hiring processes. School leaders will be given a full year and a half of collaborative school design planning time with the community.

Winter 2020-21 – Begin Middle School and High School principal selection process with community

Spring - Summer 2021 - School Design planning begins with new MS and HS principals, core design team, and community

2021-2022 - Continue School Design Planning for new Middle School and High School with core design team, and community New MS and HS student recruitment (fall); School Choice processes (spring) Staff hiring processes for new MS and HS schools (spring)

2022-2023 - Launch new feeder Middle School and comprehensive High School in August 2022

*https://www.dpsk12.org/reimagine-montbello-campus/reimagine-montbello-history/

 

5)     Sept. 22, 2020

Hiring Principals, Seeking Funds: Denver Is Moving Forward On Opening A Comprehensive High School In Montbello

                      Chalkbeat Colorado, by Melanie Asmar


The new schools are set to open in the fall of 2022.

The announcement Tuesday is the latest step as Denver moves ahead with reopening a comprehensive high school to serve far northeast Denver. The district closed the former Montbello High School in 2010 and replaced it with three smaller schools.

A community committee convened by the district in 2017 recommended bringing back a comprehensive high school. The idea met with pushback from some of the small schools that opened in the wake of Montbello High's closure. But after a representative survey showed 85% of 472 Montbello residents supported a comprehensive high school, Superintendent Susana Cordova pledged earlier this year to make it happen.

However, some parents in the neighborhood say their voices haven't been heard.

Angela Tzul's children attend one of the small schools on the Montbello campus. She and other Spanish-speaking parents said they feel left out of the decision-making process. Some didn't learn about the plan until recently, even though meetings have been taking place for years.

"There is always another person making decisions about our children," Tzul said.

The district has included $130 million* for the project in a $795 million bond it will ask Denver voters to approve in November. Depending on what voters decide, the district could renovate the existing 1980 building or build one—or possibly two—new buildings.

Many details are still undecided, including what will happen to the three schools that are currently on the Montbello campus: STRIVE Prep Montbello middle school, Noel Community Arts School, and DCIS Montbello. Noel and DCIS serve grades 6 through 12. Whereas STRIVE Prep is an autonomous charter school, Noel and DCIS are run by the district.

“…through spring 2022.” Sounds realistic, less hurried. But if it takes this long to determine the school’s vision, it will need another year to plan, hire, etc. Opening August 2022 is too soon.

On Tuesday, the district said the schools on the Montbello campus would continue to operate this school year and next. Planning for the design of the new comprehensive school and "overall vision" will begin this spring and continue through spring 2022, the district said.


Cordova said the district is also working on plans to identify a middle school that would feed students to the new comprehensive high school. It was unclear Tuesday whether the feeder middle school would be a brand new school or an existing one.  https://patch.com/colorado/denver/hiring-principals-seeking-funds-denver-moving-forward-opening-comprehensive-high

 

* Denver Voters Approve 2020 Bond, Mill Levy

On Tuesday, Nov. 3, Denver voters approved bond and mill funding measures for students in Denver Public Schools, agreeing to invest $795 million in bond funding to build and improve schools … [including] A $130 million investment into a rebuild or remodel of the former Montbello High School.” https://www.dpsk12.org/denver-voters-approve-2020-bond-mill-levy/


6)        Sept. 23, 2020

 Denver Public Schools set to recruit principals for planned schools on Montbello Campus

The Denver Post, Kieran Nicholson

 

Who would hire the leader of a school before its vision and purpose are defined?  Principals can succeed where they believe in the school’s mission. School leaders are not widgets any more than teachers.[vii] As of now we have no idea of the mission of the “new” Montello High School. The why—a well-defined purpose—precedes the who.

Denver Public Schools will soon begin recruiting principals for a planned high school and middle school at the district’s Montbello campus. Recruitment of principals will begin this winter, planning for the schools designs and overall vision will launch in the spring and continue into the spring of 2022, according to a DPS news release. Both a feeder middle school and comprehensive high school are expected to open in the 2022-23 school year.

In 2017, DPS received a recommendation from the Far Northeast Education Commission to bring a “comprehensive high school to the campus” as part of the Reimagine Montbello Campus project, the release said.

“bring back a comprehensive high school.” I repeat–see Addendum A—is this the school we want to “bring back”?

“We’ve heard from many voices in the Montbello community,” said Susana Cordova, DPS superintendent, in the release. “We want to bring back a comprehensive high school to the Far Northeast area…” https://www.denverpost.com/2020/09/22/denver-public-schools-montbello-recruit-principals/

 

7)     Sept. 24, 2020 

Montbello community wants to be included in plans to bring back comprehensive high school

Superintendent Susana Cordova announced DPS will move forward with a comprehensive high school in Montbello, "filling a gap that's been missing for the last decade."

9News, Allison Levine

 DENVER — Montbello will be getting a comprehensive high school in 2022, but details of what it will look like or provide are still unclear. 


What is meant by “the gap that has been missing”? A big school—that was failing? Or is it Friday night football, the community gathered in the stands, cheering for their team?

Isn’t the most troubling gap—the one that should be the focus for a new high school —the gap in the quality of education between what Montbello residents have experienced and what is available in other parts of Denver?

On Tuesday, superintendent Susana Cordova announced Denver Public Schools would move forward with a plan “to fill the gap that has been missing for the last decade." 

DPS closed Montbello High School in 2010.

Jennifer Bacon … called the decade-old decision "quick and not inclusive."

Steven Griffin, who graduated from Montbello High School in 2000, agreed. He was shocked to learn the school from which he'd received a diploma just a decade before would be closed and reshaped into several smaller schools.


"It felt like it just came out of nowhere," Griffin told 9NEWS. "I just wanted to understand why.”

The closure left a hole in Montbello. The high school was a uniting force, providing family and community to all those in the area.”

"The decision that was made in 2010 was really very destructive to our community. The general consensus is shutting down the Montbello Campus ripped the heart out of our community," Donna Garnett, executive director of the Montbello Organizing Committee, said.  


- “created inequities”? Please explain. What about the inequity in the quality of education Montbello High School students experienced 2000-2014?

- “undoing” what “policies”? Of more concern: what are this board’s policies? A board that voted last fall to delay the opening of a new high school for students (94% FRL in 2020-21) from the city’s highest performing middle school, DSST Noel?

It also created inequities in education that persist to this day.  

“We’re going to have to be deliberate about undoing the policies that we created that contributed to that," Jennifer Bacon told 9NEWS.

Donna Garnett was once again surprised by the content of the announcement declaring a path forward to a comprehensive high school. "It came really without our even knowing about it," she said. 

On Tuesday, Superintendent Cordova said, "the decision came after several years of community feedback that was further validated through conversations with students, staff, families and community members, community-based surveys."

To a certain extent, Bacon said she was also surprised, not by the decision to pursue a comprehensive high school but by the lack of language-centered on community involvement. 


Yes, but it would help if board members could be less opaque. The ultimate purpose remains unclear.

"We have to clearer in the community," Bacon said. "Clearer in the plan, clearer in the areas of involvement, and we need to reaffirm our neighborhood voice will be involved."

Bacon said she discovered many in Montbello … who hope to be involved in the process. Though the haste of the 2010 decision has bred mistrust with the district. 


Do we now trust a board that claims to UNIFY schools by CLOSING them …?

"What happened 10 years ago has just lingered on the minds of the community," Bacon told 9NEWS. "If you say you’re going to make your dreams come true and don’t ask them what their dreams are, that’s false."

Superintendent Cordova said the district would continue to listen to those impacted, "getting their feedback and engagement on what the community would like to see in a new space as we recreate a comprehensive high school."


“recreate a comprehensive high school” - like Montbello High School, 2000-2014?

Bacon said she is now working on a plan to ensure history doesn't repeat itself. In the age of a pandemic she's trying to determine how best to include the community voice throughout the process. "The community deserves to just really truly be heard on this and they deserve an educational option and opportunity that can really solve some of these issues that we’ve created over the last ten years," she said. 

Regardless of the outcome of the vote, Bacon told 9NEWS the focus should be not just on a comprehensive high school, but a comprehensive plan for the region.

"This is the beginning of evaluating and resetting based on what we’ve learned and based on what we know our community wants and needs," she said.  https://www.9news.com/article/news/education/montbello-community-wants-part-in-plans-return-comprehensive-high-school/73-69c73d97-ca5a-4517-8380-1822bcd433da

  

8)     Summer/Fall 2020

From Reimagine Montbello Campus – prior to the November bond vote

Video produced by DPS featuring Jennifer Bacon, Susana Cordova, and Joe Amundsen.  At Reimagine Montbello Campus on the DPS website: https://www.dpsk12.org/reimagine-montbello-campus/ 

Jennifer Bacon, Vice President of the Denver School Board of Education

 

  What has DPS has learned from its floundering efforts to bring about dramatic improvement in the comprehensive high schools it currently oversees? Can it explain why it has not brought about significant improvement in so many of them? Is it possible two of the most fundamental impediments for such schools are 1) their very size and 2) their lack of a clear mission? That in order to be “comprehensive” they try “to do it all” – which leads to no clear purpose or direction?

  “In the last ten years we’ve learned a lot and we’ve been able to say that seeing our comprehensive high school return is in our interest... even though we’re talking about ‘bringing back our high school,’ what we mostly heard were students and alumni and community naming the opportunities that they really wanted to have…

   “Reimagining Montbello High School will build upon, again, what we’ve learned from the past, the strengths and hopes and opportunities, and I really hope this is an opportunity for us a community to be able to dream and vision of what it is that we need because are at the phase of being able to build from scratch.  


Can we can agree that Montbello High School did not offer a high-quality education? That the three smaller schools operating inside the building are not providing a high-quality education? And that “robust, diverse, and successful opportunities” are nice, but they are not first and foremost what a family wants to hear? ABOVE ALL, a family wants A GOOD SCHOOL - which has not existed at Montbello High for over two decades.

  “I really hope that this can open the window for our community to be able to envision broader about what is it that we want to create in our educational landscape by way of a robust and diverse and successful school opportunities.” 




Joe Amundsen, Director de Mejora Escolar, Division de Escuelas de DPS 

   “By opening the new comprehensive high school and feeder school … we will have the opportunity to come together to design these schools in a way that truly meets the needs and desires of the Far Northeast community.” 

Superintendent Susana Cordova 

  “We welcome (all) to engage in this collaborative process to reimagine what is possible for the future of the Montbello campus.”

 

  How have the last ten years given DPS one shred of evidence that there are benefits in offering a comprehensive high school? Not one of the new schools in DPS that meets expectations is a “comprehensive high school.” There is a lesson in that, isn’t there? Each of these schools is smaller (under 600 students). Each has a clear mission. Not one was designed by or is run by the district. And all are charter schools. See Addendum D.  

  

9)      Nov. 2, 2020 – 

Reimagine Montbello with Us* – from Denver Public Schools

If the school design ultimately embraces a certain style of teaching and learning—IB, Montessori, Expeditionary Learning, CTE, project-based, etc.—it will attract and be a good fit for leaders who are knowledgeable and enthusiastic about this model. Again, selecting the principal now puts the cart before the horse.

 Students and families, if you have not yet, please complete this school leader characteristics survey by Oct. 26 to help inform the interview process for the Montbello comprehensive high school principal and feeder middle school principal. 

We will continue our partnership with community members throughout Montbello and working together with the staff, students, and families at DCIS-Montbello, Noel Community Arts, and Collegiate Prep as we prepare to unify these schools into the comprehensive high school and feeder middle school in the fall of 2022.  

*https://www.dpsk12.org/reimagine-montbello-with-us/

 

  So by November DPS had put a new frame on the process: “To unify into…” But who believed you could take three different programs with three distinct mission statements and “unify” them?

  To be sure, TO UNIFY is a more appealing term than TO CLOSE the schools. But as we learned last week: that is exactly the plan.










**

Have we learned?

 “Will this generation be able to turn things around and learn a valuable lesson from all of this? I hope so, but I have my doubts. The damage has been done. And as a lifelong student of history, it's quite evident that human beings don't learn from the mistakes of past generations.”

                                                                                             Aaron B. Powell, Voluntary

   **



Addendum A

Another View has examined efforts to turn around low-performing schools throughout the past decade. Much of the following comes from previous newsletters that included updates on Montbello.

Anyone nostalgic for the old Montbello High, even before the restructuring effort began in 2010-11, would do well to see how the school performed the years before that, 2006-2010.

1.   Dropout rate at Montbello leading up to the closure – 2006-2008

Dropout rate - Montbello High 2006-2008

2006

2007

2008

State

4.5

4.4

3.8

Montbello H.S. - total

10.4

13.3

9.0

Black/African American students

11.1

10.3

6.9

Hispanic/Latino students

10.4

15.2

10.2

 

2.      FNE Community Committee presents School Performance Framework - 2008-2010

       From AV #71- Anger, blindness – and grading schools (Nov. 21, 2010)

 

Far Northeast Schools – School Performance Framework (SPF)

 

FNE Schools

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

Rationale for Turnaround

Noel

24%

30%

27%

2nd lowest rated middle school in the city

Montbello

45%

41%

35%

Lowest rated comprehensive high school in the city. Graduation rate is only 59% and for every 100 students who enter as freshmen, only 4 go on to graduate and go to college without requiring remediation.

From presentation by the Far Northeast Community Committee at Noel Middle School, Sept. 28, 2010. 

Part of a 72-page Power Point presentation.  Produced by A+ Denver and Denver Public Schools.

 

3.      Academic Achievement at Montbello – 2008-2012

From AV #81 - $37 million to Colorado for Turnaround Schools (August 5, 2011)

 

Montbello High School – Percent Proficient and Advanced on CMAS assessment

 

Grade

2009

2010

GOAL for 2011

RESULTS 2011

GAP Between 2011 goal & results

READING

9

30

25

45

28

-17

 

10

35

31

45

18

-27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WRITING

9

15

6

30

14

-16

 

10

15

11

30

6

-24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATH

9

6

6

20

9

-11

 

10

4

7

20

5

-15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From AV #86 - The School Improvement Grant to DPS and Pueblo City 60  (August 23, 2012)

Page 5

Change in students scoring - Proficient and Advanced from 2011 to 2012

 

Reading

Writing

Math

District average

2.71

2.2

1.3

Montbello High

-3.44

-2.39

-1.03

Rachel Noel

-6.47

2.68

-7.8

          (http://www.ednewscolorado.org/2012/08/09/42243-voices-is-slow-and-steady-enough-for-dps)

 

Page 8

GROWTH[viii] – 2012 - Montbello High School

Subject

Median Growth Percentile

Adequate Growth Percentile

% Catching Up

Reading

25.5

95.0

6.4%

Math

30.0

99.0

1.8%

Writing

32.0

99.0

1.9

 

From CDE’s Growth Fact Sheet:
“As defined by the Colorado State Board of Education, a child who falls below the 35 percentile for growth is considered to have made low growth. Typical growth is between the 36th and 65th percentile. The state median growth percentile is 50 for each grade and subject. High growth is above the 65th percentile.”
www.cde.state.co.us › accountability › growth-fact-sheet

 

Page 10

Colorado State Assessment Program (CSAP) - % Proficient or Advanced 

In 2012, the second full year of the 3-year $3.4 million School Improvement Grant from the federal government, Montbello High School showed:

1. Its lowest 9th grade reading score in five years.                             

2. Overall 9th grade scores lower from 2011, largely unchanged from 2010 before the SIG funds were made available.

3. 10th grade reading scores had fallen from 31% proficient in 2010—before the SIG funds were available—to 18% proficient after year one of the grant, to 16% proficient after year two of the grant.

4. 10th grade writing, math, and science scores - all lower than they were in 2010 before the funds were made available.

 

[2008-2011 are CSAP scores, 2012 are TCAP scores. % Proficient and Advanced.

Scores in single digits highlighted] 

 

.Subject

Grade

% Prof. and Adv. 2012

% Prof. and Adv. 2011

% Prof. and Adv. 2010

% Prof. and Adv. 2009

% Prof. and Adv. 2008

Fall 2011 poverty rate

Reading

9

23

28

25

30

31

86%

Writing

9

9

14

6

15

12

86%

Math

9

7

9

6

6

8

86%

Reading

10

16

18

31

35

31

86%

Writing

10

6

6

11

15

11

86%

Math

10

5

5

7

4

4

86%

Science

10

5

5

10

8

7

86%

 

From - Public School Review – Montbello High School profile - for 2012-13 school year

 

·        The percentage of students achieving proficiency in math was ≤10% (which was lower than the Colorado state average of 57%) for the 2012-13 school year.

·        The percentage of students achieving proficiency in reading/language arts was 20-29% (which was lower than the Colorado state average of 70%) for the 2012-13 school year.

https://www.publicschoolreview.com/montbello-high-school-profile

 

4.      Remediation rates

            A.     2010 – “Analysis gives DPS a lesson plan,” The Denver Post, by Jeremy Meyer, May 25, 2010

    “DPS kids need help after graduation … many students who enroll in college require remedial course once they get there.”

   [Chart showed 12 high schools, comparing] “the number of graduates who enroll in college to the number who do so without requiring extra help.” Bottom four high schools on the chart:

 

 

Enrollment of graduates, first fall after graduation

Percent who enrolled in college without remediation

Abraham Lincoln High

30%

6%

Montbello High

35%

6%

North High

37%

4%

West High

23%

1%

 

B.     2013 – 2014 - Remediation rate for Montbello High: 62.5% (2013)   69.23% (2014)

Remediation rate for state: 33.2% (2013)    33.8% (2014)

             From AV #131 - Higher graduation rates? A word of caution before we celebrate (June 10, 2015)

 

 

5.      ACT scores – among lowest in the state – 2009- 2013

From AV #92 (January 1, 2013) and AV #131

 

 

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Montbello High School

14.7

15.0

15.3

15.0

15.1

State Average

 

 

 

20.0

20.1

The college readiness benchmark, according to ACT:

21

Average score, according to CDE, of a 4-year college graduate (Bachelor’s degree):

24

 

   6.      Advanced Placement – 2012 - lowest pass rate of 16 DPS high schools

               From AV #95–Mismatch – Adding more AP classes in low-performing high schools (March 2013)

 

Page 8  - AP Pass rates at 16 Denver high schools - highest to lowest – from 76% to 8%

 

Chart included all 16 high schools. Here are the highest and lowest.

 

Number tested

Number passed

AP Pass rate 2012

Denver School of Science & Technology

202

153

76%

Montbello High

312

25

8%

 

Page 9 - Percentage of students taking AP exam at low-achieving high schools

 

Montbello High School

2010

2011

2012

# tested

% Passed

# tested

% Passed

# tested

% Passed

357

8%

434

10%

312

8%

 

 

 

7.      School Performance Framework – Montbello – 2010 - 2014

Colorado’s School Performance Framework, a product of the Education Accountability Act of 2009, began its reports in 2010. Montbello High School, on Turnaround status that year on the state’s SPF, began its restructuring in 2010-11. A school being phased out is unlikely to improve – morale is low, perhaps for both teachers and students, as the building grows emptier each year – but still, the SPF ratings are a useful reminder of MHS, not so long ago.

     2010-12 from AV #92, Why not a regional recovery school district? (January 2013)

 

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Montbello High School

Turnaround Plan

Priority Improvement Plan

Turnaround Plan

Turnaround Plan

School Closed

Percentage pts earned

41.2%

44.2%

40.8%

41.3%

31.2%

 

Addendum B

 

GOAL: high-quality schools – Denver school board revises its School Performance Compact

School Performance Compact – This policy passed in December 2015. It included one phrase and/or idea numerous times.  The school board, in approving of this policy, revealed its focus on quality for any new school, or for any plan to replace existing low-performing schools.

·        “create new high quality schools”

·        “to expand high quality school choices” (from Denver Plan 2020)

·        “increase the number of high quality schools”

·        “so that all students have access to highly effective schools”

·        “provides a high quality education for DPS students”

·        “focused on improving the quality of its schools for all students”

·        “to ensure all students have access to high quality schools”

·        “the District will seek to promptly intervene to ensure that students have access to higher quality education”

·        “Every family deserves choice and access to high quality schools in their neighborhood.”  

·        “for the community to provide input and evaluate all approved and high-quality school applicants”

·        “District staff shall be responsible for identifying and attracting a pipeline so high quality school applicants”

 

In 2018, however, the board no longer applied the policy guidelines in the 2015 Compact. 

 

   The School Performance Compact (SPC) is a Board policy adopted in December 2015 with the intention of defining a clear process for how DPS will identify the most persistently low-performing schools. [The Portfolio Management Team] PMT uses the SPC to inform its charter renewal and innovation authorization processes.

SPC Implementation

   The DPS Board of Education decided in fall 2018 that the previous implementation guidelines of the SPC would not be applied. Considering the community dialogue, they launched new implementation guidelines during the 2018-19 school year, and these guidelines will continue during the 2019-20 school year. The Board and the District share an ongoing responsibility to ensure students have access to high-quality schools in their neighborhoods and the SPC continues to provide important guideposts in efforts to improve DPS schools. http://thecommons.dpsk12.org/Page/1946

 

A summary of that decision by the board (School Performance Compact for 2018-19 to Focus on Board Oversight of Improvement Plans[ix] included this passage to stress that there would still be a real focus on quality:

DPS’ top priority is to ensure students have access to high-quality schools in every neighborhood. “The School Performance Compact is a promise to both internal and external stakeholders — our communities, our kids, our students’ families — for quality schools,” said District 5 Board Representative Lisa Flores. (June 12, 2018)  https://www.dpsk12.org/school-performance-compact-for-2018-19-to-focus-on-board-oversight-of-improvement-plans/

 

Reassuring words. And yet the shift invites the question: how much of a top priority, and why the change? 

More specifically, how much is it a top priority to the Denver School Board, or to the district, in creating a new comprehensive high school and its feeder school at Montbello? 

We hear about dreams and opportunities. We hear about competing against the big high schools in sports, a wider choice of courses, a community hub… Do we hear a focus on creating a good school?

 

Addendum C

 DPS: a careful, thoughtful process for “New Quality Schools” – will it apply to a new Montbello High?


The Reimagining Montbello Timeline now indicates the design planning for the new middle and high school will continue into the spring of 2022. If so, any completed design for a new school at Montbello would be A YEAR LATE - if it were to meet the district’s own guidelines for a school set to open in the fall of 2022.

Why not follow the New Quality Schools Process? It has a history and a well-developed series of steps that might prove extremely helpful to this work.

Denver Public Schools has created a careful plan on how to invite and evaluate new school proposals (see below). It wisely insists on plenty of planning time. Any new school that plans to open in the fall of 2022 needs to have its Letter of Intent in to the district IN TWO WEEKS, by Feb. 26, 2021, and its application is due on April 92021.


 
I would assume this should apply to ANY New school, especially one that says it will serve 1,600 students.  I would expect the entire New Quality School Process would be relevant when the district wants to open two new schools (a feeder middle and a high school) at Montbello High.   

My assumptions were wrong. I asked the Portfolio Management Team at DPS if it would be involved. This was part of their response:

 

...the new Montbello High School and Feeder Middle School will not go through a Call for New Quality Schools application process. This process is outside of the Facility Allocation Policy as the board resolution is to unify DCIS Montbello, Noel Community Arts School, and Collegiate Prep Academy into these two schools, as opposed to creating new schools as a result of school turnaround or opening a new school based on new capacity needs (where the Facility Allocation Policy applies). (email to me, Feb. 4, 2021)                     (Bold mine)              

Now that we know that unify into means close, perhaps the board and district will reassess this position. 

You might compare the latest timeline that DPS has presented for the design of the new Montbello High with the more deliberate timeline of the New Quality Schools Process. There are many good reasons it expects a sound proposal to be submitted 16 months before a school might open. 

From the website of Denver Public School’s Portfolio Management Team.

        1.   Create New Schools 

DPS believes new schools play a critical role in ensuring all students have access to great schools. DPS determines if new schools are needed based on two primary factors: school performance and district enrollment needs. New schools are authorized through DPS’ rigorous quality authorizing process, the Call for New Quality Schools. https://portfolio.dpsk12.org/create-new-schools/

  2.    See New Quality Schools Process

To learn more about the process or to apply, read the application materials below. Letters of Intent are due February 26, 2021 by 12PM to CNQS@dpsk12.org.

2021 DPS New Quality School Application

2021 New Quality School District-Run Budget Template

2021 New Quality School Charter Budget Template 

https://portfolio.dpsk12.org/applicant-supports/#1531770545016-3e5bf9fc-208f

 

3.     For new District-run and public charter schools intending to open in fall 2022

See Copy of 2021 DPS New Quality School Application – 113 pages  (Revised January 2021) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-7V0mDhpWtmdRqTibFz8JM5NzWx0UUrsWXhUinUSPGA/edit

The Letter to New School Developers from the Portfolio Management Team at DPS includes this statement:

The 2021 application release introduces the rigorous Quality Authorizing Process DPS offers for developers of new district-run and charter schools and provides important contextual information, which include a focus on designing for equity, that we encourage school developers and community partners to consider as they design new programs.      (Bold mine)

 

4.      Quality Authorizing Process Timeline

Item

Dates

Application Materials Released

January 15, 2021

Letters of Intent Due

February 26, 2021

New School Applications Due

April 9, 2021

District Sponsored Community Events

April 19, 2021 - April 30, 2021

Applicant Interviews

May 3, 2021 - May 7, 2021

Applicant Presentations to DPS Board of Education

June 7, 2021

District Accountability Committee (DAC) Recommendations to DPS Board of Education

June 7, 2021

Superintendent Recommendations to DPS Board of Education

June 7, 2021

Public Comment with DPS Board of Education

June 10, 2021

DPS Board of Education Vote on Quality of Applications

June 10, 2021

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiDgd7FkRGdWIBBP0o5BMpHNTFrJbwdVIwsw_6K9a1o/edit#heading=h.mmt0nbpfem4v


Addendum D

Where can we see evidence of success in Denver? What can we learn from six of the newer high schools authorized by Denver Public Schools, but not created or designed by the district?

P = Performance (highest rating)  I = Improvement (second highest rating)

6 Denver charter schools serving a majority of students on FRL, with the state’s two highest ratings

% of students FRL (on Free or Reduced Lunch)

# of students enrolled

State’s School Performance Framework

Denver’s School Performance Framework

 

2020-21

2019 (most recent year available)

DSST: Cole High

87%

348

I

Accredited on Watch

DSST: College View High

86%

558

P

Meets Expectations

KIPP Northeast Denver Leadership Academy

80%

574

I

Meets Expectations

DSST: Green Valley Ranch High

70%

580

P

Meets Expectations

DSST: Montview High

67%

578

P

Meets Expectations

KIPP Denver Collegiate High

66%

492

I

Accredited on Watch

 

% of students enrolled in 2020-21 on Free or Reduced Lunch

DCIS at Montbello

93%

Noel Community Arts School

84%

STRIVE Prep - Montbello

91%

Several other new charters serving high school students that are either on Performance or Improvement, but their student enrollment is less than 60% FRL. Their success, then, might be less relevant when making comparisons with the population likely to enroll at Montbello High School—given current FRL figures for the three schools there today (see box).

What if an entity – independent of DPS – were entrusted with the task of designing a new school for Montbello High? Guided by Denver’s New Quality School Process, it would bring a strong “a focus on designing for equity.” It would naturally seek out any models in Denver where equity is visible to anyone ... willing to look. It would be eager to make the most of any lessons such schools could offer, even if they are charter schools. 

“When [a] crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around.” Milton Friedman

It would quickly realize these six charters did not begin with the idea that first you decide to create a building for 1,600 students, and then you work backwards. Instead, they gave careful thought to the optimum size for the kind of community and culture they wanted to build—and designed the school accordingly. 

Ditto re designing the school around a clear mission. Never once thinking that it would be a good idea to try to be comprehensive. Certain that it is best to be about something, to have strong beliefs about the kind of school it envisioned. 

Ditto re designing the school’s governance, knowing how critical it would be to have considerable autonomy from the district.  

Good ideas, “lying around.” Worth considering. If we would only look…

 

 

Endnotes



[i] “Why We Can’t Stop Longing for the Good Old Days,” Wall Street Journal, by Johan Norberg, Dec. 26-27, 2020.

[ii]The reunification of West High is one of two efforts underway to bring comprehensive high schools back to neighborhoods where they were dismantled. The hope at the time was that smaller schools would better serve students there, many of whom are Hispanic or Black.

  But a decade later, communities in west and far northeast Denver are calling for the return of their traditional high schools. The process to reunify West has been faster and simpler than one to bring a comprehensive high school back to the northeast Montbello neighborhood.” “Denver school board votes to reunify West High School,” bMelanie Asmar, Chalkbeat Colorado, Nov 19, 2020. https://co.chalkbeat.org/2020/11/19/21578841/denver-vote-to-reunify-west-high-school 

[iii]Huidekoper: High school graduation rates aren’t necessarily a reason to celebrate,” The Denver Post, July 2, 2015. https://www.denverpost.com/2015/07/02/huidekoper-high-school-graduation-rates-arent-necessarily-a-reason-to-celebrate/

ALSO-

Another View #131: “Higher graduation rates? A word of caution before we celebrate,” June 15, 2015.

Another View #162: “Higher graduation rates in Colorado – fake news,” June 6, 2017.

Another View #183: “Remediation rates suggest our graduation rates will soon fall,” Sept. 5, 2018.

[iv] AV #161 - Schools with a mission - What if all public schools (not just charters) were asked to define what they are about? (May 23, 2017).

Excerpt:                                                                        We just say yes

One of the most profound remarks I heard about public education in the past quarter century was this “joke”:  Q: What is the mission of our public schools?

A: You name it, we start it.

Or-

A: We just say yes.

[v] CDE – District and School Support - http://www.cde.state.co.us/accountability/performance

[vi] 2019 Request for Information - School Redesign - Release of CDE’s 2019 School Redesign Request for Information (RFI)

CDE has released its 2019 School Redesign Request for Information (RFI), in which it invites partners to join the state’s effort to transform low-performing schools and ensure that all students – regardless of where they live – have access to schools that prepare them for college and career…Through the 2019 RFI, CDE will accept new submissions as well as continuation submissions from organizations who are already on CDE’s Advisory List of Providershttp://www.cde.state.co.us/accountability/cde-advisory-list-of-providers

[vii] THE WIDGET EFFECT - ERIC - US Department of Education

files.eric.ed.gov  - “The Widget Effect describes the tendency of school districts to assume classroom effectiveness is the same from teacher to teacher. This decades-old fallacy fosters an environment in which teachers cease to be understood as individual professionals, but rather as interchangeable parts.”

[viii] From AV #86 – The notes on page 7 of that newsletter came from EdNewsColorado.

*The Colorado Growth Model uses four key indicators – based on an analysis of students’ testing history – to paint a picture of academic progress by school and district:

Median Growth Percentile: Shows how much a group of students is progressing compared to others. Typical growth for an individual student centers around 50. Lower means slower growth, higher means better than average.

Adequate Growth Percentile: Shows the growth that students needed on average in the past year to reach or maintain proficiency within three years or by the tenth grade, whichever comes first. With this indicator, lower is better. Lower numbers mean less growth is required.

“Catching up”: The percentage of students who previously scored below proficient in this subject but who have shown enough growth in the past year to reach proficiency within three years or by 10th grade. They’re “catching up” to proficiency so a higher number is better. http://www.ednewscolorado.org/2012/08/08/42114-find-your-schools-2012-growth-scores.

No comments:

Post a Comment