If I had only known. Last winter I presented a 30-page report on the state of reading in Colorado. If I had seen The Right to Read by then, I would have given a shoutout to this amazing 2023 documentary. I had hoped “After the READ Act – Beyond third grade, how well do our students read?” would have an impact. The literacy results I reported were alarming. I sought a greater focus on reading skills for all of K-12 in our state. “After the Read Act” gave evidence that at least 70,000 students in grades 4-11 are struggling to read well.
The Right to Read, Director, Jenny Mackenzie; Executive Producer, LeVar Burton, 2023. https://www.therighttoreadfilm.org/watch-the-film |
But this 70-minute film, subtitled, "The greatest civil rights issue of our time," provides the inspiration I failed to offer. (More in Addendum A.)
2024 Literacy Update – Did Not Yet
Meet Expectations - Again, over 70,000 students
WE CANNOT LET THIS CONTINUE.
2023
- After 3rd Grade |
2024
Update |
|||
Reading
& Writing - Did Not Yet Meet Expectations |
||||
CMAS ELA |
% |
#
of students |
% |
#
of students* |
Grade 4 |
14.5% |
8,063 |
14.5% |
8,078 |
5 |
7.9% |
4,494 |
8.2% |
4,588 |
6 |
10.3% |
5,734 |
10.2% |
5,565 |
7 |
13.2% |
7,126 |
12.8% |
6,826 |
8 |
16.5% |
8,561 |
18.1% |
9,110 |
9
- PSAT |
21.2% |
12,391 |
18.2% |
10,435 |
10
- PSAT |
22.1% |
12,429 |
20.3% |
11,562 |
11
- SAT |
28% |
15,663 |
30.6% |
17,326 |
|
|
74,461** |
|
73,429 |
**This
total far exceeds the 51,294 students in 4-12 on a READ plan that year.[i] |
Though not inspirational, AV #276 gives a brief update from my Reading Report.[ii]
One more attempt to call attention to the issue. This box appeared on page one
of the Executive Summary. It highlighted the staggering number of students in
grades 4-11 (after the READ Act’s work is done), who scored at the
lowest level possible - well below grade level - on our state
literacy assessments in 2023.
2024, update: again, over 70,000
students.
Doesn’t this cry out for attention? Is
it not tragic that we pass along thousands of students from one grade to the
next, fully aware that we have not been able to help them tackle this most fundamental
skill? Isn’t it our responsibility to do far more to provide teachers and
schools the skills and resources to address this disturbing picture of the literacy
skills of so many students?
MOST DISTURBING OF ALL: See below on the ever-rising percentage of students of color who Did Not Meet Expectations. Data, I believe, all in support of the film’s theme: literacy is a civil rights issue.
My Reading report stressed
that we must go well beyond the K-3 efforts of the READ Act to meet this crisis.
Test scores show the READ Act has led to progress in our elementary
schools. In 2023 and 2024 we now see fewer 5th grade students performing at the
lowest level. That is positive. Less than 9% Did
Not Meet Expectations on the state’s reading and writing assessment. Good
news on the other end, too: last spring 47% of 5th graders Met or Exceeded
Expectations—the highest percentage for any grade.
However, from
that point on, in our middle and high schools, we see the ever-rising number of
students who score at the lowest level on the state’s assessments of reading
& writing.
Colorado – All Students – grades 4-11 – rising
percentage scoring at lowest level on literacy
Colorado –
Students of color - grade 6-11 -
It is especially alarming to see how pronounced
this trend is for students of color.
Grade 7 – “only”
one in five Did Not Yet Meet Expectations. By Grade 11 – nearly one-half.
CMAS (6-8) and
PSAT/SAT (9-11) - % Did Not Meet Expectations
|
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Black/African American |
17.4 |
20.0 |
23.9 |
27.7 |
33.1 |
45.7 |
Hispanic/Latino |
16.9 |
21.9 |
26.2 |
31.6 |
35.0 |
50.7 |
White |
5.7 |
7.0 |
9.4 |
8.6 |
9.8 |
16.9 |
State-wide averages not persuasive? Here are 26 schools, from 15 districts.
Some shrug at state-wide averages. “Not
my district. “Not my school.”
Does
this bring the issue home? In at least 10 districts most Hispanic
students in 11th grade scored Did Not Yet Meet Expectations
on the state’s literacy assessment in 2024.1. Fort Morgan – 69.6%
2. Montezuma-Cortez - 66.7%
3. Adams 14 – 64.3%
4. Colorado Springs – 64%
5. Aurora Public Schools – 63%
6. Trinidad – 62.5%
7. Westminster – 62.3%
8. Denver Public Schools – 56%
9. Roaring Fork – 52.8%
10. St. Vrain – 52.4%
2024
scores - Over 50% in Grade 11 Did Not Yet Meet Expectations on SAT - Reading &
Writing
|
|
Black |
Hispanic[iv] |
Adams 12 |
Thornton High School |
|
66.2 |
Aurora Public Schools |
Aurora Central H.S. |
75.0 |
74.1 |
|
Aurora West College Prep Academy |
|
63.6 |
|
Gateway H.S. |
62.7 |
73.3 |
|
Hinkley H.S. |
71.9 |
69.0 |
Bennett 29J |
Bennet H.S. |
|
68.8 |
Cherry Creek School
District |
Overland H.S. |
50.8 |
60.5 |
Colorado Springs
District 11 |
Mitchell H.S. |
|
74.8 |
|
Nikola Tesla Education Opportunity
Ctr |
|
89.7 |
Denver Public Schools |
Abraham Lincoln H.S. |
78.9 |
80.4 |
|
Bruce Randolph H.S. |
|
62.5 |
|
Dr. MLK Jr. Early College |
|
58.0 |
|
George Washington H.S. |
71.2 |
61.3 |
|
John F. Kennedy H.S. |
|
55.9 |
|
Manual H.S. |
|
58.1 |
|
Montbello H.S. |
61.5 |
70.0 |
|
North H.S. |
|
58.7 |
District 27J |
Brighton H.S. |
|
57.4 |
Harrison 2 |
Harrison H.S. |
|
58.5 |
Jefferson County R-1 |
Alameda International
Jr/Sr H.S. |
|
74.0 |
Roaring Fork Re-1 |
Glenwood Springs H.S. |
|
53.7 |
St. Vrain Valley
School District |
Frederick Senior H.S. |
|
51.5 |
Thompson R2-J |
Loveland H.S. |
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
|
ONLINE SCHOOLS |
|
|
|
Byers 32J |
Astravo Online Academy
H.S. |
|
62.5 |
District 49 |
GOAL Academy |
70.6 |
72.8 |
Douglas County Re-1 |
HOPE on-Line Learning |
|
72.5 |
Appalling? Stunning?
Outrageous? Unacceptable? If not a crisis, how would you describe it?
Let’s
agree that the READ Act is just a start. It identifies and serves tens of
thousands of boys and girls we classify as significantly reading deficient. Its
work makes a difference. But when we see the results for 70,000 students in
grades 4-11, isn’t it obvious we need to do much more?
**
Addendum A - The Right to Read (film)
(con’t from page one) -
The documentary features the work of Kareem Jabbar Weaver, a teacher and parent in Oakland, CA. His passion is inspiring. We see him work with his local NAACP to make literacy a priority in the community. They petition the Oakland school board. They bring change. The "science of reading" comes to the schools. We follow a remarkable first0grade teacher as she implements the new approach, leading to dramatic improvement for her students. We hear from several figures who have studied and worked on our reading crisis. It is the most compelling film on education I have seen in a decade.
Weaver quotes from Frederick
Douglass, born into slavery, who wrote: “Once you learn to read, you will be forever free.” And from Maya Angelou: “The elimination of illiteracy is as important to our history
as the end of slavery.” |
To whet your appetite, a few quotes from the film.
Kareem Jabbar Weaver: “When I started teaching in Oakland, there were only two
kids in my class of 35 who could read.”
“This is a civil
rights issue. We’re really trying to figure out how to get Oakland kids to
read.”
“It is a national
problem that cuts across demographics, but it’s painted as a minority issue… Kids
of all races are struggling to read. This issue is who has the resources to deal
with it.”
“The question is: do
we have the political will and do we have the moral courage and fortitude to
use literacy as a vehicle to include all?”
“Literacy is our
greatest civil right. If you can’t read, you can’t access anything in our
society.”
“This is social justice.”
Emily Hanford, writer, “How Teaching Kids to Read Went So Wrong”: “We have a lot of people who struggle
to read… if you look at the basic data, why aren’t we screaming and yelling
about this?”
Dr. Kymyona Burk, past State Literacy Director in
Mississippi, where reading scores have greatly improved: “We want to make sure that all
students have the opportunity to be with a teacher who has learned the science
of reading….”
“It has been said that illiteracy is one of the most solvable issues of
our time. We have the research. We have the practice. We have to do what’s best
for children…”
Addendum B - NAEP data
Throughout the film we see grim statistics
on the percentage of students who are not proficient readers, using NAEP data
from California, Tennessee, and Mississippi. Here I add
Colorado NAEP results from 2022. We hear doubts as to how well our state
assessments capture the reading and writing skills of our students. I have
expressed my own questions about the use of the PSAT/SAT in all Colorado high
schools,[v]
such as those on the pages above. But NAEP, called “the nation’s report card,”
is harder to dismiss. And for 4th graders in Colorado in 2022, its
results: 38% Proficient/Advanced, were actually lower than our CMAS
score: 44.1% Met Expectations.[vi]
NAEP* READING SCORES, GRADE 4 - National, data from the
film,
and Colorado, data from CDE - https://www.cde.state.co.us/assessment/conaep
|
From the film – NAEP 2019 data: National |
My addition – using NAEP 2022 data: Colorado |
Proficient level |
Data shows only
33% of 4th graders score Proficient or Advanced; 66% score
below Proficient. Stated: “We are failing 2/3 of our children.” |
38% scored
Proficient or Advanced – [the lowest % at this level in Colorado since 2007,
when 36% scored Proficient or better.] Meaning over 60% - 3/5 of our 4th
graders – were not reading at a Proficient level. Percent scored Proficient or better: White – 49% Black – 21% Hispanic – 20% |
Basic level |
Stated: “One-third of our 4th graders cannot even read at a Basic level. That is a lot of kids.” “… even more shocking, nearly one-half of our kids of color cannot read at a Basic level.” |
69% scored
Basic or better. 31% scored below
Basic, so nearly one-third of 4th graders were not reading
at a Basic level. Percent scored Basic or better: White – 80% Black – 49% Hispanic – 49% Meaning
roughly one-half of students of color were not reading at a Basic level. |
*National
Assessment of Educational Progress
Endnotes
[i]
From CDE:
Grade |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Count on a
READ Plan |
12,708 |
10,548 |
2,157* |
6,747 |
6,371 |
5,132 |
3,676 |
2,524 |
1,411 |
*Indicates the cohort related to the interruption in the
collection due to COVID.
[ii] REPORT – “After the READ Act - Beyond 3rd grade, how well do our students read?” (Feb. 2024) https://anotherviewphj.blogspot.com/2024/02/
[iv] An obvious question: are students learning English as a second language taking the SAT as juniors? And shouldn’t this be a factor when looking at these SAT results? Yes and Yes. I do see why we make students unprepared for an assessment such as the SAT in reading and writing endure this exam. Look at the numbers. So absolutely, the scores recorded for Hispanic students must keep in mind these results for NEP and LEP students:
-For NEP (Not English Proficient) students - 90% (2,567 out 2,852) scored Did Not Yet Meet Expectations.
-For LEP (Limited English Proficient) students
- 99% (911 out of 923) scored Did Not Yet Meet Expectations.
(CDE adds this point of clarification: “not all
NEP/LEP students are Hispanic, and not
all Hispanic students are/were NEP/LEP.”)
[v]
AV#233 - “The PSAT and SAT
do not work well for perhaps 25% of our high schools.” AV #234 – “Accountability: Besides
PSAT/SAT, how else can high schools measure their performance?” (Jan. 2021) Another View - https://anotherviewphj.blogspot.com/
[vi]
Colorado Department of Education, 2022 CMAS scores, https://www.cde.state.co.us/assessment/2022_cmas_ela_math_statesummaryachievementresults.
No comments:
Post a Comment